1991•OAR@UM (University of Malta)Open access

The concept of freedom

Anthony John Saliba

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

History records various occasions where man strove hard to obtain \nfreedom, or to maintain what he already possessed of it. Every man \ndesires to be free though not all men agree about what constitutes freedom. \nToo often, freedom is attached to and influenced by political ideologies or \nreligious beliefs. \nWhen we ask: 'What is freedom?' we must bear in mind that this concept \nis predicated in different ways of beings of very different types. Many misunderstand \nthis concept as a 'free-for:-all' principle. Others reduce freedom \nto a choice between good and evil. Ethics, or moral philosophy, insists that \nhuman actions can only be so considered provided that such actions result \nfrom man's free will. At the same time, ethics goes into the problem of \nfreedom versus determinism. \nWhat do we mean by freedom? Two points may be very useful in discussing \nfreedom (a) freedom of choice: the ability to choose this or that, selecting \nfrom various objects/values; (b) freedom as constituting a basic right of \nman (e.g. the French Revolution sought to present freedom as such. This \ndoes not imply that freedom was not a fundamental human right before the \nAmerican or French Revolutions). This freedom covers the freedom of expression \n- to express reality as one sees it, the freedom of worship, and the \nfreedom to follow a particular career or state of life. It constitutes man's \nright to live out his life as he wants to.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

History records various occasions where man strove hard to obtain \nfreedom, or to maintain what he already possessed of it. Every man \ndesires to be free though not all men agree about what constitutes freedom. \nToo often, freedom is attached to and influenced by political ideologies or \nreligious beliefs. \nWhen we ask: 'What is freedom?' we must bear in mind that this concept \nis predicated in different ways of beings of very different types. Many misunderstand \nthis concept as a 'free-for:-all' principle. Others reduce freedom \nto a choice between good and evil. Ethics, or moral philosophy, insists that \nhuman actions can only be so considered provided that such actions result \nfrom man's free will. At the same time, ethics goes into the problem of \nfreedom versus determinism. \nWhat do we mean by freedom? Two points may be very useful in discussing \nfreedom (a) freedom of choice: the ability to choose this or that, selecting \nfrom various objects/values; (b) freedom as constituting a basic right of \nman (e.g. the French Revolution sought to present freedom as such. This \ndoes not imply that freedom was not a fundamental human right before the \nAmerican or French Revolutions). This freedom covers the freedom of expression \n- to express reality as one sees it, the freedom of worship, and the \nfreedom to follow a particular career or state of life. It constitutes man's \nright to live out his life as he wants to.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

History records various occasions where man strove hard to obtain \nfreedom, or to maintain what he already possessed of it. Every man \ndesires to be free though not all men agree about what constitutes freedom. \nToo often, freedom is attached to and influenced by political ideologies or \nreligious beliefs. \nWhen we ask: 'What is freedom?' we must bear in mind that this concept \nis predicated in different ways of beings of very different types. Many misunderstand \nthis concept as a 'free-for:-all' principle. Others reduce freedom \nto a choice between good and evil. Ethics, or moral philosophy, insists that \nhuman actions can only be so considered provided that such actions result \nfrom man's free will. At the same time, ethics goes into the problem of \nfreedom versus determinism. \nWhat do we mean by freedom? Two points may be very useful in discussing \nfreedom (a) freedom of choice: the ability to choose this or that, selecting \nfrom various objects/values; (b) freedom as constituting a basic right of \nman (e.g. the French Revolution sought to present freedom as such. This \ndoes not imply that freedom was not a fundamental human right before the \nAmerican or French Revolutions). This freedom covers the freedom of expression \n- to express reality as one sees it, the freedom of worship, and the \nfreedom to follow a particular career or state of life. It constitutes man's \nright to live out his life as he wants to.

Key concepts: Epistemology, Computer science, Political science, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The concept of freedom — Research Paper | ScholarLens