2017•Scientia Militaria South African Journal of Military StudiesOpen access

Military Law practitioners and academic discourse: A Sine Qua Non for developing Military Law

Nel Michelle

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

There has been limited development in South African military law since the inception of the Union Defence Force in 1912. Military law has mainly evolved as a way to enforce discipline in a force consisting of mostly conscripted members and a historical comparison of the relevant legislation shows no renewal in military justice or its processes in spite of a shift to a new all-volunteer force. Surely the approach towards discipline and military justice should also change. However, the limited development seen since was only brought about when necessitated by Constitutional challenges and external factors. This also seems true for the military law practitioners’ understanding of what military law entails. Generally military law is understood as the criminal law of the soldier, limiting it to the realm of military justice. Considering the expanding role of armed forces internationally, and the secondary roles of its employment, there is a clear need for a broadening of the definition and scope of military law as a discipline. The author argues that there are a number of other disciplines that can be of great assistance in a broadening of our understanding of military law. This article therefore argues that there is a critical need to develop military law as well as our understanding of what is entails. This then requires the development of a legal-academic discourse within the discipline.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There has been limited development in South African military law since the inception of the Union Defence Force in 1912. Military law has mainly evolved as a way to enforce discipline in a force consisting of mostly conscripted members and a historical comparison of the relevant legislation shows no renewal in military justice or its processes in spite of a shift to a new all-volunteer force. Surely the approach towards discipline and military justice should also change. However, the limited development seen since was only brought about when necessitated by Constitutional challenges and external factors. This also seems true for the military law practitioners’ understanding of what military law entails. Generally military law is understood as the criminal law of the soldier, limiting it to the realm of military justice. Considering the expanding role of armed forces internationally, and the secondary roles of its employment, there is a clear need for a broadening of the definition and scope of military law as a discipline. The author argues that there are a number of other disciplines that can be of great assistance in a broadening of our understanding of military law. This article therefore argues that there is a critical need to develop military law as well as our understanding of what is entails. This then requires the development of a legal-academic discourse within the discipline.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There has been limited development in South African military law since the inception of the Union Defence Force in 1912. Military law has mainly evolved as a way to enforce discipline in a force consisting of mostly conscripted members and a historical comparison of the relevant legislation shows no renewal in military justice or its processes in spite of a shift to a new all-volunteer force. Surely the approach towards discipline and military justice should also change. However, the limited development seen since was only brought about when necessitated by Constitutional challenges and external factors. This also seems true for the military law practitioners’ understanding of what military law entails. Generally military law is understood as the criminal law of the soldier, limiting it to the realm of military justice. Considering the expanding role of armed forces internationally, and the secondary roles of its employment, there is a clear need for a broadening of the definition and scope of military law as a discipline. The author argues that there are a number of other disciplines that can be of great assistance in a broadening of our understanding of military law. This article therefore argues that there is a critical need to develop military law as well as our understanding of what is entails. This then requires the development of a legal-academic discourse within the discipline.

Key concepts: Military justice, Law, Political science, Military theory, Military science, Use of force, Sine qua non, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Military Law practitioners and academic discourse: A Sine Qua Non for developing Military Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens