2015The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal CommunicationRequires access

Attribution in Conflict

ALAN L. SILLARS, Rachel M. McLaren

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Attributions are inferences about the underlying causes or motivations for human behavior. In conflict situations, attribution processes are involved when people assign blame, evaluate intentions behind offending behavior, or assess the likelihood that conflict can be managed cooperatively. There are many documented attribution biases that can exacerbate conflicts. Attribution biases affect the way people assign blame and responsibility for conflict, which has direct repercussions for communication. When people attribute conflict to the negative traits or intentional acts of others, they often communicate in a negative, verbally competitive, or ambiguous/avoidant manner. Biases also affect attributions for communicative intent and message reception. These biases can be mitigated by engaging in conflict reframing, increasing awareness and knowledge of attribution biases, and exerting control over attributions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Attributions are inferences about the underlying causes or motivations for human behavior. In conflict situations, attribution processes are involved when people assign blame, evaluate intentions behind offending behavior, or assess the likelihood that conflict can be managed cooperatively. There are many documented attribution biases that can exacerbate conflicts. Attribution biases affect the way people assign blame and responsibility for conflict, which has direct repercussions for communication. When people attribute conflict to the negative traits or intentional acts of others, they often communicate in a negative, verbally competitive, or ambiguous/avoidant manner. Biases also affect attributions for communicative intent and message reception. These biases can be mitigated by engaging in conflict reframing, increasing awareness and knowledge of attribution biases, and exerting control over attributions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Attributions are inferences about the underlying causes or motivations for human behavior. In conflict situations, attribution processes are involved when people assign blame, evaluate intentions behind offending behavior, or assess the likelihood that conflict can be managed cooperatively. There are many documented attribution biases that can exacerbate conflicts. Attribution biases affect the way people assign blame and responsibility for conflict, which has direct repercussions for communication. When people attribute conflict to the negative traits or intentional acts of others, they often communicate in a negative, verbally competitive, or ambiguous/avoidant manner. Biases also affect attributions for communicative intent and message reception. These biases can be mitigated by engaging in conflict reframing, increasing awareness and knowledge of attribution biases, and exerting control over attributions.

Key concepts: Attribution, Blame, Social psychology, Psychology, Cognitive reframing, Affect (linguistics), Attribution bias, Control (management)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Attribution in Conflict — Research Paper | ScholarLens