1977J.B. Metzler eBooksRequires access

The Rise and Fall of New Criticism: Its Brief Dialectic History from I. A. Richards to Northrop Frye

Edward Jayne

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

I. A. Richards’ emphasis upon the individual judgment of poetry based on one’s whole experience, implicit in the criticism of Eliot, Pound, and Hulme, was first attenuated by Winters’ ethical approach, then by the cognitive approach of Ransom, the formalist strategies of Brooks, Wimsatt and Wellek, and finally the archetypal theory of modes and genres proposed by Northrop Frye. With this the affective theory of response was brought to its dialectic negation in a contextualist reification which both culminated and terminated the viable ideas at the root of Anglo-American New Criticism. At present the task of criticism is to return to the affective principles first elucidated by Richards, but now within a synthetic context open to a variety of disciplines inclusive of the Marxist and Freudian theories which had been offensive to almost all the New Critics including Richards himself.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I. A. Richards’ emphasis upon the individual judgment of poetry based on one’s whole experience, implicit in the criticism of Eliot, Pound, and Hulme, was first attenuated by Winters’ ethical approach, then by the cognitive approach of Ransom, the formalist strategies of Brooks, Wimsatt and Wellek, and finally the archetypal theory of modes and genres proposed by Northrop Frye. With this the affective theory of response was brought to its dialectic negation in a contextualist reification which both culminated and terminated the viable ideas at the root of Anglo-American New Criticism. At present the task of criticism is to return to the affective principles first elucidated by Richards, but now within a synthetic context open to a variety of disciplines inclusive of the Marxist and Freudian theories which had been offensive to almost all the New Critics including Richards himself.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I. A. Richards’ emphasis upon the individual judgment of poetry based on one’s whole experience, implicit in the criticism of Eliot, Pound, and Hulme, was first attenuated by Winters’ ethical approach, then by the cognitive approach of Ransom, the formalist strategies of Brooks, Wimsatt and Wellek, and finally the archetypal theory of modes and genres proposed by Northrop Frye. With this the affective theory of response was brought to its dialectic negation in a contextualist reification which both culminated and terminated the viable ideas at the root of Anglo-American New Criticism. At present the task of criticism is to return to the affective principles first elucidated by Richards, but now within a synthetic context open to a variety of disciplines inclusive of the Marxist and Freudian theories which had been offensive to almost all the New Critics including Richards himself.

Key concepts: Criticism, Dialectic, Philosophy, Marxist philosophy, New Criticism, Literature, Pound (networking), Reification (Marxism)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Rise and Fall of New Criticism: Its Brief Dialectic History from I. A. Richards to Northrop Frye — Research Paper | ScholarLens