2017Cogent Arts and HumanitiesOpen access

Concentration or representation: The struggle for popular sovereignty

Peter Hallward

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

There is a tension in the notion of popular sovereignty, and the notion of democracy associated with it, that is both older than our terms for these notions themselves and more fundamental than the apparently consensual way we tend to use them today. After a review of the competing conceptions of “the people” that underlie two very different understandings of democracy, this article will defend what might be called a “neo-Jacobin” commitment to popular sovereignty, understood as the formulation and imposition of a shared political will. A people’s egalitarian capacity to concentrate both its collective intelligence and force, from this perspective, takes priority over concerns about how best to represent the full variety of positions and interests that differentiate and divide a community.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There is a tension in the notion of popular sovereignty, and the notion of democracy associated with it, that is both older than our terms for these notions themselves and more fundamental than the apparently consensual way we tend to use them today. After a review of the competing conceptions of “the people” that underlie two very different understandings of democracy, this article will defend what might be called a “neo-Jacobin” commitment to popular sovereignty, understood as the formulation and imposition of a shared political will. A people’s egalitarian capacity to concentrate both its collective intelligence and force, from this perspective, takes priority over concerns about how best to represent the full variety of positions and interests that differentiate and divide a community.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There is a tension in the notion of popular sovereignty, and the notion of democracy associated with it, that is both older than our terms for these notions themselves and more fundamental than the apparently consensual way we tend to use them today. After a review of the competing conceptions of “the people” that underlie two very different understandings of democracy, this article will defend what might be called a “neo-Jacobin” commitment to popular sovereignty, understood as the formulation and imposition of a shared political will. A people’s egalitarian capacity to concentrate both its collective intelligence and force, from this perspective, takes priority over concerns about how best to represent the full variety of positions and interests that differentiate and divide a community.

Key concepts: Sovereignty, Popular sovereignty, Democracy, Representation (politics), Variety (cybernetics), Politics, Perspective (graphical), Jacobin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Concentration or representation: The struggle for popular sovereignty — Research Paper | ScholarLens