1992Humana Press eBooksRequires access

Drug Abuse Treatment

M. Douglas Anglin, Yih‐Ing Hser

Open publisher page 117 citations

Abstract

Illicit drug use has had profound economic and cultural effects on American society, contributing to sharp increases in the crime rate, accelerating the spread of AIDS, and diverting some minority groups from the economic mainstream. The primary response of government agencies has been increased effort to reduce crime rates by preventing the spread of drug use to uninitiated populations and interdicting the flow of drugs into the United States.1–3 Such approaches have been both costly and limited in effect, however,4 and alternatives, especially reducing demand for drugs by treating drug addicts, are increasingly promoted. A growing body of evidence indicates that demand reduction efforts directed toward those seriously involved represents a far more cost-effective method for reducing drug use, the user’s criminal activities, and the resulting burden on society.5–11

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Illicit drug use has had profound economic and cultural effects on American society, contributing to sharp increases in the crime rate, accelerating the spread of AIDS, and diverting some minority groups from the economic mainstream. The primary response of government agencies has been increased effort to reduce crime rates by preventing the spread of drug use to uninitiated populations and interdicting the flow of drugs into the United States.1–3 Such approaches have been both costly and limited in effect, however,4 and alternatives, especially reducing demand for drugs by treating drug addicts, are increasingly promoted. A growing body of evidence indicates that demand reduction efforts directed toward those seriously involved represents a far more cost-effective method for reducing drug use, the user’s criminal activities, and the resulting burden on society.5–11

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 117 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Illicit drug use has had profound economic and cultural effects on American society, contributing to sharp increases in the crime rate, accelerating the spread of AIDS, and diverting some minority groups from the economic mainstream. The primary response of government agencies has been increased effort to reduce crime rates by preventing the spread of drug use to uninitiated populations and interdicting the flow of drugs into the United States.1–3 Such approaches have been both costly and limited in effect, however,4 and alternatives, especially reducing demand for drugs by treating drug addicts, are increasingly promoted. A growing body of evidence indicates that demand reduction efforts directed toward those seriously involved represents a far more cost-effective method for reducing drug use, the user’s criminal activities, and the resulting burden on society.5–11

Key concepts: Drug, Mainstream, Government (linguistics), Substance abuse, Public economics, Business, Criminology, Development economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Drug Abuse Treatment — Research Paper | ScholarLens