2017•Korean Journal of MedicineOpen access

Controversies Regarding the New Definition of Sepsis

Ji Hoon Jeon, Dae Won Park

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (SEPSIS-3) task force assessed the latest pathophysiological parameters associated with sepsis and septic shock and defined sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection.This SEPSIS-3 definition may be applied using relevant clinical and biological criteria including changes in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and serum lactate levels.The new definition does not include criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome or the concept of 'severe sepsis.'The SEPSIS-3 definition aims to devise more precise descriptions of sepsis and to improve clinical care.However, there are important questions relating to the clinical application of the new definition.We review the main characteristics and limitations of previous definitions and discuss some of the potential controversies raised by the new framework.(Korean J Med 2017;92:342-348)

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (SEPSIS-3) task force assessed the latest pathophysiological parameters associated with sepsis and septic shock and defined sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection.This SEPSIS-3 definition may be applied using relevant clinical and biological criteria including changes in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and serum lactate levels.The new definition does not include criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome or the concept of 'severe sepsis.'The SEPSIS-3 definition aims to devise more precise descriptions of sepsis and to improve clinical care.However, there are important questions relating to the clinical application of the new definition.We review the main characteristics and limitations of previous definitions and discuss some of the potential controversies raised by the new framework.(Korean J Med 2017;92:342-348)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (SEPSIS-3) task force assessed the latest pathophysiological parameters associated with sepsis and septic shock and defined sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection.This SEPSIS-3 definition may be applied using relevant clinical and biological criteria including changes in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and serum lactate levels.The new definition does not include criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome or the concept of 'severe sepsis.'The SEPSIS-3 definition aims to devise more precise descriptions of sepsis and to improve clinical care.However, there are important questions relating to the clinical application of the new definition.We review the main characteristics and limitations of previous definitions and discuss some of the potential controversies raised by the new framework.(Korean J Med 2017;92:342-348)

Key concepts: Sepsis, Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Septic shock, Intensive care medicine, Medicine, SOFA score, Organ dysfunction, Shock (circulatory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Controversies Regarding the New Definition of Sepsis — Research Paper | ScholarLens