The Standard of Proof in Discrimination Claims: The Full Court Lightens the Load, a Little
Brook Hely
Abstract
Brook Hely
Abstract
The decision of the Full Federal Court in the 'Qantas Airways v Gama' case lessens the burden of the applicant in providing the civil standard of proof in discrimination claims. The decision that racial/disability discrimination claims should be approached as any other civil claim when evaluating the standard of proof is a welcome change from earlier decisions that discrimination claims are 'serious' issues which need more proof than other civil claims.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The decision of the Full Federal Court in the 'Qantas Airways v Gama' case lessens the burden of the applicant in providing the civil standard of proof in discrimination claims. The decision that racial/disability discrimination claims should be approached as any other civil claim when evaluating the standard of proof is a welcome change from earlier decisions that discrimination claims are 'serious' issues which need more proof than other civil claims.
Key concepts: Civil rights, Law, Burden of proof, Civil procedure, Summary judgment, Political science, Actuarial science, Law and economics