ScholarLens Back to search
2019•Bar News: The Journal of the NSW Bar AssociationRequires access

The civil practice and procedure provisions strike again in the High Court

Jeremy L Harrison

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This appeal concerned whether the continuance of proceedings constituted an abuse of process in circumstances where prior proceedings which concerned substantially the same matters were discontinued, the merits of the matter had not been determined, and delay had not made a fair trial impossible.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This appeal concerned whether the continuance of proceedings constituted an abuse of process in circumstances where prior proceedings which concerned substantially the same matters were discontinued, the merits of the matter had not been determined, and delay had not made a fair trial impossible.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This appeal concerned whether the continuance of proceedings constituted an abuse of process in circumstances where prior proceedings which concerned substantially the same matters were discontinued, the merits of the matter had not been determined, and delay had not made a fair trial impossible.

Key concepts: Appeal, Continuance, Law, Political science, High Court, Civil procedure

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The civil practice and procedure provisions strike again in the High Court — Research Paper | ScholarLens