2017LiriasRequires access

Electoral Volatility and Ideological Congruence. Do Volatile Voters Vote More Correctly

Dieter Stiers, Ruth Dassonneville

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A rich literature has already investigated the characteristics of voters who switch parties, focusing on levels of political involvement and political sophistication of volatile voters. The ndings of this body of literature are rather mixed. In this paper, we argue that in order to gain insights in the quality of the party choice of volatile voters, we should not focus on individual-level characteristics of these voters, but investigate the quality of their choices more directly. We build on previous work on correct voting and investigate the extent to which stable and volatile voters choose the correct party. Our analyses of campaign-switching in American national elections show that those who switch parties are signicantly less likely to vote for the correct party. Importantly, this basic pattern holds over time and regardless of how cognitively mobilised the volatile voters are.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A rich literature has already investigated the characteristics of voters who switch parties, focusing on levels of political involvement and political sophistication of volatile voters. The ndings of this body of literature are rather mixed. In this paper, we argue that in order to gain insights in the quality of the party choice of volatile voters, we should not focus on individual-level characteristics of these voters, but investigate the quality of their choices more directly. We build on previous work on correct voting and investigate the extent to which stable and volatile voters choose the correct party. Our analyses of campaign-switching in American national elections show that those who switch parties are signicantly less likely to vote for the correct party. Importantly, this basic pattern holds over time and regardless of how cognitively mobilised the volatile voters are.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A rich literature has already investigated the characteristics of voters who switch parties, focusing on levels of political involvement and political sophistication of volatile voters. The ndings of this body of literature are rather mixed. In this paper, we argue that in order to gain insights in the quality of the party choice of volatile voters, we should not focus on individual-level characteristics of these voters, but investigate the quality of their choices more directly. We build on previous work on correct voting and investigate the extent to which stable and volatile voters choose the correct party. Our analyses of campaign-switching in American national elections show that those who switch parties are signicantly less likely to vote for the correct party. Importantly, this basic pattern holds over time and regardless of how cognitively mobilised the volatile voters are.

Key concepts: Congruence (geometry), Volatility (finance), Ideology, Econometrics, Social psychology, Political science, Economics, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Electoral Volatility and Ideological Congruence. Do Volatile Voters Vote More Correctly — Research Paper | ScholarLens