2017LiriasRequires access

Do volatile voters vote less correctly? An analysis of correct voting among switchers in U.S. presidential election campaigns

Dieter Stiers, Ruth Dassonneville

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Are campaign-switchers voting less correctly than stable voters? A rich literature has already investigated the characteristics of voters who switch parties, focusing on levels of political involvement and political sophistication of volatile voters. The findings of this body of literature are rather mixed. In this paper, we argue that in order to gain insights in the quality of the party choice of volatile voters, we should not focus on individual-level characteristics of these voters, but investigate the quality of their choices more directly. We build on previous work on correct voting and investigate the extent to which stable and volatile voters choose the correct party. Our analyses of campaign-switching in American national elections show that those who switch parties are significantly less likely to vote for the correct party. Importantly, this basic pattern holds over time and regardless of how cognitively mobilized the volatile voters are.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Are campaign-switchers voting less correctly than stable voters? A rich literature has already investigated the characteristics of voters who switch parties, focusing on levels of political involvement and political sophistication of volatile voters. The findings of this body of literature are rather mixed. In this paper, we argue that in order to gain insights in the quality of the party choice of volatile voters, we should not focus on individual-level characteristics of these voters, but investigate the quality of their choices more directly. We build on previous work on correct voting and investigate the extent to which stable and volatile voters choose the correct party. Our analyses of campaign-switching in American national elections show that those who switch parties are significantly less likely to vote for the correct party. Importantly, this basic pattern holds over time and regardless of how cognitively mobilized the volatile voters are.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Are campaign-switchers voting less correctly than stable voters? A rich literature has already investigated the characteristics of voters who switch parties, focusing on levels of political involvement and political sophistication of volatile voters. The findings of this body of literature are rather mixed. In this paper, we argue that in order to gain insights in the quality of the party choice of volatile voters, we should not focus on individual-level characteristics of these voters, but investigate the quality of their choices more directly. We build on previous work on correct voting and investigate the extent to which stable and volatile voters choose the correct party. Our analyses of campaign-switching in American national elections show that those who switch parties are significantly less likely to vote for the correct party. Importantly, this basic pattern holds over time and regardless of how cognitively mobilized the volatile voters are.

Key concepts: Group voting ticket, Spoilt vote, Presidential election, Voting, Bullet voting, Contingent vote, Political science, Cardinal voting systems

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Do volatile voters vote less correctly? An analysis of correct voting among switchers in U.S. presidential election campaigns — Research Paper | ScholarLens