2014•ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)Requires access

Room Low Frequency Response Estimation using Microphone Averaging

Julius Newell, Philip Newell, Keith Holland

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Little has been published about the repercussions of different source locations and measuring positions for the Low-Frequency Effects (LFE) loudspeakers in cinemas and dubbing theatres (cinema sound-track mixing rooms). The aim of this study is to determine the effects of the number and positioning of the loudspeakers on the uniformity of the response over the listening area, and to assess the effect of the measuring of those responses by the choices made regarding the positioning of the microphones within typically used arrays. Some organizations issuing recommendations for the installation layout specification, such as Dolby, [1] have long suggested that the installation of low frequency effects loudspeakers below the screen should be made asymmetrically. The reason given for this is to avoid the symmetrical driving of the low-frequency modal responses of the rooms. If two loudspeakers or groups of loudspeakers are used, one may typically be centred about 20% of the distance fromone side-wall, with the other centred about 33% of the distance from the opposite side wall. However, other organisations, and many designers, have recommended the mounting of the LFE loudspeakers in tight-packed clusters. Furthermore, it has long been suggested that a single microphone position is inadequate for measuring the response of an LFE channel because the long wavelengths involved make spacial variation in the measurements inevitable. Typically, 4, 5, 8 and 10-microphone arrays have been used, but as rooms differ so much in size, shape and acoustic properties, no universal instructions exist about precisely how to place the microphones in such arrays. This paper examines how the choice of low-frequency source positions and the microphone positions in the common, 5-microphone array can affect the measured average responses over the delineated listening areas. It also discusses how the positioning of the loudspeakers can affects the evenness of coverage. The results of the spacially averaged responses will be compared with the responses at individual microphone positions, in order to assess how representative the averages are of the responses at specific locations.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Little has been published about the repercussions of different source locations and measuring positions for the Low-Frequency Effects (LFE) loudspeakers in cinemas and dubbing theatres (cinema sound-track mixing rooms). The aim of this study is to determine the effects of the number and positioning of the loudspeakers on the uniformity of the response over the listening area, and to assess the effect of the measuring of those responses by the choices made regarding the positioning of the microphones within typically used arrays. Some organizations issuing recommendations for the installation layout specification, such as Dolby, [1] have long suggested that the installation of low frequency effects loudspeakers below the screen should be made asymmetrically. The reason given for this is to avoid the symmetrical driving of the low-frequency modal responses of the rooms. If two loudspeakers or groups of loudspeakers are used, one may typically be centred about 20% of the distance fromone side-wall, with the other centred about 33% of the distance from the opposite side wall. However, other organisations, and many designers, have recommended the mounting of the LFE loudspeakers in tight-packed clusters. Furthermore, it has long been suggested that a single microphone position is inadequate for measuring the response of an LFE channel because the long wavelengths involved make spacial variation in the measurements inevitable. Typically, 4, 5, 8 and 10-microphone arrays have been used, but as rooms differ so much in size, shape and acoustic properties, no universal instructions exist about precisely how to place the microphones in such arrays. This paper examines how the choice of low-frequency source positions and the microphone positions in the common, 5-microphone array can affect the measured average responses over the delineated listening areas. It also discusses how the positioning of the loudspeakers can affects the evenness of coverage. The results of the spacially averaged responses will be compared with the responses at individual microphone positions, in order to assess how representative the averages are of the responses at specific locations.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Little has been published about the repercussions of different source locations and measuring positions for the Low-Frequency Effects (LFE) loudspeakers in cinemas and dubbing theatres (cinema sound-track mixing rooms). The aim of this study is to determine the effects of the number and positioning of the loudspeakers on the uniformity of the response over the listening area, and to assess the effect of the measuring of those responses by the choices made regarding the positioning of the microphones within typically used arrays. Some organizations issuing recommendations for the installation layout specification, such as Dolby, [1] have long suggested that the installation of low frequency effects loudspeakers below the screen should be made asymmetrically. The reason given for this is to avoid the symmetrical driving of the low-frequency modal responses of the rooms. If two loudspeakers or groups of loudspeakers are used, one may typically be centred about 20% of the distance fromone side-wall, with the other centred about 33% of the distance from the opposite side wall. However, other organisations, and many designers, have recommended the mounting of the LFE loudspeakers in tight-packed clusters. Furthermore, it has long been suggested that a single microphone position is inadequate for measuring the response of an LFE channel because the long wavelengths involved make spacial variation in the measurements inevitable. Typically, 4, 5, 8 and 10-microphone arrays have been used, but as rooms differ so much in size, shape and acoustic properties, no universal instructions exist about precisely how to place the microphones in such arrays. This paper examines how the choice of low-frequency source positions and the microphone positions in the common, 5-microphone array can affect the measured average responses over the delineated listening areas. It also discusses how the positioning of the loudspeakers can affects the evenness of coverage. The results of the spacially averaged responses will be compared with the responses at individual microphone positions, in order to assess how representative the averages are of the responses at specific locations.

Key concepts: Loudspeaker, Microphone, Acoustics, Computer science, Frequency response, Active listening, Engineering, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Room Low Frequency Response Estimation using Microphone Averaging — Research Paper | ScholarLens