2014Current ScienceRequires access

Academic Impact of Chinese Medical Journals in the Web of Science, 2009-2012

J.F. Shao, Huiyun Shen

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

An objective and multi-perspective evaluation of academic impact might provide a more complete understanding of the recent evolution of Chinese medical journals. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the academic impact of these journals using citation data from the JCR database. We collected data on Chinese medical journals for the analysis, including journal title, ISSN, language, publisher, frequency, impact factor, median impact factor (category), citable items, total cites, self cites, immediacy index, and aggregate immediacy index (category). We found most indicators of the Chinese medical journals were in middle-low position or low position. This indicated that the quality and impact of these journals was comparatively low. Based on the above finding, efforts need to be made to improve the quality and impact of Chinese medical journals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An objective and multi-perspective evaluation of academic impact might provide a more complete understanding of the recent evolution of Chinese medical journals. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the academic impact of these journals using citation data from the JCR database. We collected data on Chinese medical journals for the analysis, including journal title, ISSN, language, publisher, frequency, impact factor, median impact factor (category), citable items, total cites, self cites, immediacy index, and aggregate immediacy index (category). We found most indicators of the Chinese medical journals were in middle-low position or low position. This indicated that the quality and impact of these journals was comparatively low. Based on the above finding, efforts need to be made to improve the quality and impact of Chinese medical journals.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An objective and multi-perspective evaluation of academic impact might provide a more complete understanding of the recent evolution of Chinese medical journals. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the academic impact of these journals using citation data from the JCR database. We collected data on Chinese medical journals for the analysis, including journal title, ISSN, language, publisher, frequency, impact factor, median impact factor (category), citable items, total cites, self cites, immediacy index, and aggregate immediacy index (category). We found most indicators of the Chinese medical journals were in middle-low position or low position. This indicated that the quality and impact of these journals was comparatively low. Based on the above finding, efforts need to be made to improve the quality and impact of Chinese medical journals.

Key concepts: CITES, Impact factor, Immediacy, Citation, Perspective (graphical), Quality (philosophy), Science Citation Index, Position (finance)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Academic Impact of Chinese Medical Journals in the Web of Science, 2009-2012 — Research Paper | ScholarLens