1980Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONALRequires access

Comparison of Methods for Determination of Sulfur in Fertilizer: Collaborative Study

Virginia A Thorpe, Collaborators:, L. D. Bailey, Evan M. Erickson, L Fathergill, Charles W. Gehrke, John H Holmes, Nathan D. Jones, P Lonn, R L McAvoy, Eric Moore, Roseanne Price, R K Sensmeier, J R Silkey, Rose A Sweeney, J. M. Winters, T C Woodis

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Methods with applications for total sulfur (sulfate, elemental sulfur) in dry fertilizers, for total sulfur (sulfate, sulfite, thiosulfate, sulfide) in liquid fertilizers, for total sulfur (elemental sulfur) in sulfur-coated urea and elemental sulfur formulations, and for thiosulfate sulfur in ammonium thiosulfate liquid fertilizer (12-0-0, 26 S), and 7 samples with background and directions were submitted to 12 collaborating laboratories for comparison to official methods 2.160–2.161 and 2.162. The methods studied are simple and rapid, and recover the total sulfur in fertilizers containing high levels of elemental sulfur and thiosulfate sulfur. Method 2.160–2.161 does not recover total sulfur in these products. The first 3 methods have been adopted as official first action, and the present official methods for sulfur, 2.160–2.161 and 2.162, have been repealed, official first action.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Methods with applications for total sulfur (sulfate, elemental sulfur) in dry fertilizers, for total sulfur (sulfate, sulfite, thiosulfate, sulfide) in liquid fertilizers, for total sulfur (elemental sulfur) in sulfur-coated urea and elemental sulfur formulations, and for thiosulfate sulfur in ammonium thiosulfate liquid fertilizer (12-0-0, 26 S), and 7 samples with background and directions were submitted to 12 collaborating laboratories for comparison to official methods 2.160–2.161 and 2.162. The methods studied are simple and rapid, and recover the total sulfur in fertilizers containing high levels of elemental sulfur and thiosulfate sulfur. Method 2.160–2.161 does not recover total sulfur in these products. The first 3 methods have been adopted as official first action, and the present official methods for sulfur, 2.160–2.161 and 2.162, have been repealed, official first action.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Methods with applications for total sulfur (sulfate, elemental sulfur) in dry fertilizers, for total sulfur (sulfate, sulfite, thiosulfate, sulfide) in liquid fertilizers, for total sulfur (elemental sulfur) in sulfur-coated urea and elemental sulfur formulations, and for thiosulfate sulfur in ammonium thiosulfate liquid fertilizer (12-0-0, 26 S), and 7 samples with background and directions were submitted to 12 collaborating laboratories for comparison to official methods 2.160–2.161 and 2.162. The methods studied are simple and rapid, and recover the total sulfur in fertilizers containing high levels of elemental sulfur and thiosulfate sulfur. Method 2.160–2.161 does not recover total sulfur in these products. The first 3 methods have been adopted as official first action, and the present official methods for sulfur, 2.160–2.161 and 2.162, have been repealed, official first action.

Key concepts: Sulfur, Thiosulfate, Chemistry, Sulfide, Ammonium sulfate, Sulfate, Sulfite, Fertilizer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Methods for Determination of Sulfur in Fertilizer: Collaborative Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens