2014DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Requires access

Comparison of clinical efficacy between phacoemulsification and small incision extracapsular cataract extraction for senile cataract

Yong Li, Zhang-Xian Yue, Hailong Xu, Zhao-Chen Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the clinical therapeutic effects of senile cataract on phacoemulsification and small incision cataract surgery and the influence of corneal endothelium. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in 296 cases of senile cataract in our hospital from Jan. 2009 to Jan. 2013 in the "Cataract extraction project". One hundred and forty cases underwent phacoemulsification treatment, whereas 156 cases received small incision extracapsular cataract extraction. The therapeutic efficacy and effects on corneal endothelial cells of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: After 3d operation, the visual acuity and corneal astigmatism in phacoemulsification group were much better than that in small incision cataract surgery group(P<0.05), and the two groups were statistically significant differences before operation(P<0.05). However, after 1 and 3mo, the acuity, astigmatism and preoperative and postoperative complications had no significant differences(P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Both phacoemulsification and small incision extracapsular cataract extraction are effective methods of treatment of cataract. However, the method of small incision cataract surgery is more economic, and it is valuable in primary hospital and the “Cataract extraction project”.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To evaluate the clinical therapeutic effects of senile cataract on phacoemulsification and small incision cataract surgery and the influence of corneal endothelium. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in 296 cases of senile cataract in our hospital from Jan. 2009 to Jan. 2013 in the "Cataract extraction project". One hundred and forty cases underwent phacoemulsification treatment, whereas 156 cases received small incision extracapsular cataract extraction. The therapeutic efficacy and effects on corneal endothelial cells of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: After 3d operation, the visual acuity and corneal astigmatism in phacoemulsification group were much better than that in small incision cataract surgery group(P<0.05), and the two groups were statistically significant differences before operation(P<0.05). However, after 1 and 3mo, the acuity, astigmatism and preoperative and postoperative complications had no significant differences(P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Both phacoemulsification and small incision extracapsular cataract extraction are effective methods of treatment of cataract. However, the method of small incision cataract surgery is more economic, and it is valuable in primary hospital and the “Cataract extraction project”.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To evaluate the clinical therapeutic effects of senile cataract on phacoemulsification and small incision cataract surgery and the influence of corneal endothelium. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in 296 cases of senile cataract in our hospital from Jan. 2009 to Jan. 2013 in the "Cataract extraction project". One hundred and forty cases underwent phacoemulsification treatment, whereas 156 cases received small incision extracapsular cataract extraction. The therapeutic efficacy and effects on corneal endothelial cells of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: After 3d operation, the visual acuity and corneal astigmatism in phacoemulsification group were much better than that in small incision cataract surgery group(P<0.05), and the two groups were statistically significant differences before operation(P<0.05). However, after 1 and 3mo, the acuity, astigmatism and preoperative and postoperative complications had no significant differences(P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Both phacoemulsification and small incision extracapsular cataract extraction are effective methods of treatment of cataract. However, the method of small incision cataract surgery is more economic, and it is valuable in primary hospital and the “Cataract extraction project”.

Key concepts: Senile cataract, Phacoemulsification, Medicine, Cataract extraction, Ophthalmology, Clinical efficacy, Surgery, Visual acuity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of clinical efficacy between phacoemulsification and small incision extracapsular cataract extraction for senile cataract — Research Paper | ScholarLens