2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Experiences with conservation tillage and no till in Austria.

Andreas Klik, B. Frauenfeld, K. Hollaus, Edzard van Santen

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Soil erosion is a major threat to the r esource soil. The objective of this 8 yrstudy was to compar e different tillage systems with r espect to runoff, soil loss, nutrient, and pesticide transport. Three different tillage systems were compared: 1) conventional tillage (CT), 2) conser ­ vation tillage with cover crop (CS), and 3) no-till with cover crop (NT). No significant differ ences in total runoff during growing season wer e measured between the thr ee tillage practices. Overall average annual soil loss ranged from 0.82 to 3.13 tons acr e -1 , with the highest amount for conventionally tilled plots and the lowest for no-till plots. Nutrient losses fr om April to October were 8.4 lbs acr e -1 yr -1 for CT, 5.4 lbs acr e -1 yr -1 for CS, and 2.7 lbs acr e -1 yr -1 for NT. Corresponding values for phosphorus wer e 4.1, 1.9, and 1.0 lbs acr e -1 yr -1 . Conservation tillage and no-till management were able to r educe pesticide losses between 23 and 99 %.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Soil erosion is a major threat to the r esource soil. The objective of this 8 yrstudy was to compar e different tillage systems with r espect to runoff, soil loss, nutrient, and pesticide transport. Three different tillage systems were compared: 1) conventional tillage (CT), 2) conser ­ vation tillage with cover crop (CS), and 3) no-till with cover crop (NT). No significant differ ences in total runoff during growing season wer e measured between the thr ee tillage practices. Overall average annual soil loss ranged from 0.82 to 3.13 tons acr e -1 , with the highest amount for conventionally tilled plots and the lowest for no-till plots. Nutrient losses fr om April to October were 8.4 lbs acr e -1 yr -1 for CT, 5.4 lbs acr e -1 yr -1 for CS, and 2.7 lbs acr e -1 yr -1 for NT. Corresponding values for phosphorus wer e 4.1, 1.9, and 1.0 lbs acr e -1 yr -1 . Conservation tillage and no-till management were able to r educe pesticide losses between 23 and 99 %.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Soil erosion is a major threat to the r esource soil. The objective of this 8 yrstudy was to compar e different tillage systems with r espect to runoff, soil loss, nutrient, and pesticide transport. Three different tillage systems were compared: 1) conventional tillage (CT), 2) conser ­ vation tillage with cover crop (CS), and 3) no-till with cover crop (NT). No significant differ ences in total runoff during growing season wer e measured between the thr ee tillage practices. Overall average annual soil loss ranged from 0.82 to 3.13 tons acr e -1 , with the highest amount for conventionally tilled plots and the lowest for no-till plots. Nutrient losses fr om April to October were 8.4 lbs acr e -1 yr -1 for CT, 5.4 lbs acr e -1 yr -1 for CS, and 2.7 lbs acr e -1 yr -1 for NT. Corresponding values for phosphorus wer e 4.1, 1.9, and 1.0 lbs acr e -1 yr -1 . Conservation tillage and no-till management were able to r educe pesticide losses between 23 and 99 %.

Key concepts: Tillage, No-till farming, Surface runoff, Conventional tillage, Environmental science, Cover crop, Agronomy, Mulch-till

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experiences with conservation tillage and no till in Austria. — Research Paper | ScholarLens