2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Tillage Effects on Soil Erosion, Nutrient, and Pesticide Transport

Andreas Klik, A. S. Zartl, J C Rosner

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

The objective of this long-term field study is to compare different tillage systems with respect to runoff,soil loss, nutrient and pesticide transport. Three different tillage systems are compared: 1) conventionaltillage (CV), 2) conservation tillage with cover crop (CS), and 3) no-till with cover crop (NT).No significant differences in total runoff during growing season were measured between the three tillagepractices. Overall average annual soil loss ranged from 2.7 to 8.4 t ha-1 with highest amount forconventional tilled and lowest for no-till plots. Nutrient losses from April to October were 13.7 kg ha-1 a-1for CV, 9.1 kg ha-1 a-1 for CS, and 7.7 kg ha-1 a-1 for NT. Corresponding values for phosphorus were 6.5,3.1, and 2.0 kg ha-1 a-1. Conservation tillage and no-till management were able to reduce pesticide lossesbetween 23 and 99 %.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of this long-term field study is to compare different tillage systems with respect to runoff,soil loss, nutrient and pesticide transport. Three different tillage systems are compared: 1) conventionaltillage (CV), 2) conservation tillage with cover crop (CS), and 3) no-till with cover crop (NT).No significant differences in total runoff during growing season were measured between the three tillagepractices. Overall average annual soil loss ranged from 2.7 to 8.4 t ha-1 with highest amount forconventional tilled and lowest for no-till plots. Nutrient losses from April to October were 13.7 kg ha-1 a-1for CV, 9.1 kg ha-1 a-1 for CS, and 7.7 kg ha-1 a-1 for NT. Corresponding values for phosphorus were 6.5,3.1, and 2.0 kg ha-1 a-1. Conservation tillage and no-till management were able to reduce pesticide lossesbetween 23 and 99 %.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of this long-term field study is to compare different tillage systems with respect to runoff,soil loss, nutrient and pesticide transport. Three different tillage systems are compared: 1) conventionaltillage (CV), 2) conservation tillage with cover crop (CS), and 3) no-till with cover crop (NT).No significant differences in total runoff during growing season were measured between the three tillagepractices. Overall average annual soil loss ranged from 2.7 to 8.4 t ha-1 with highest amount forconventional tilled and lowest for no-till plots. Nutrient losses from April to October were 13.7 kg ha-1 a-1for CV, 9.1 kg ha-1 a-1 for CS, and 7.7 kg ha-1 a-1 for NT. Corresponding values for phosphorus were 6.5,3.1, and 2.0 kg ha-1 a-1. Conservation tillage and no-till management were able to reduce pesticide lossesbetween 23 and 99 %.

Key concepts: Tillage, Surface runoff, Conventional tillage, Environmental science, Nutrient, Agronomy, No-till farming, Cover crop

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tillage Effects on Soil Erosion, Nutrient, and Pesticide Transport — Research Paper | ScholarLens