Applications for Certificates of Appealability and the Supreme Court's "Obligatory" Jurisdiction
Brent E. Newton
Abstract
Open-access reader
Brent E. Newton
Abstract
Open-access reader
Since 1925, with the passage of the Judges' Bill,' Congress increasingly has afforded the Supreme Court unfettered discretion to decide whichever cases it chooses.2 The Court's "discretionary" docket includes almost all of the cases coming before it today, 3 while its "mandatory" or "obligatory" 4 docket now includes only a select few types of cases.5
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Since 1925, with the passage of the Judges' Bill,' Congress increasingly has afforded the Supreme Court unfettered discretion to decide whichever cases it chooses.2 The Court's "discretionary" docket includes almost all of the cases coming before it today, 3 while its "mandatory" or "obligatory" 4 docket now includes only a select few types of cases.5
Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Jurisdiction, Original jurisdiction, Discretion, Appeal, Political science, Obligation