2005•The William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository (William & Mary)Open access

AEDPA Deference and the Undeveloped State Factual Record: Monroe v. Angelone and New Evidence

Rachel Wheeler

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In federal district court, Monroe also alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel and challenged the sufficiency of the evidence against her.She based her ineffective assistance of counsel claim on trial counsel's failure to challenge the voluntariness of her statements to a detective during the investigation of the murder.See Monroe v. Angelone, No. 3:98CV254, 2002 U.S. Dist.LEXIS 26310, at *86-89 (E.D. Va.Mar. 28, 2002).She eventually dropped the ineffective assistance of counsel claim.Following the disposition of her habeas claim in federal district court, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit declined to hear the sufficiency of the evidence claim, finding "the district court's resolution of this claim is not 'debatable amongst jurists of reason."Monroe, 323 F.3d at 290 n.2.4.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In federal district court, Monroe also alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel and challenged the sufficiency of the evidence against her.She based her ineffective assistance of counsel claim on trial counsel's failure to challenge the voluntariness of her statements to a detective during the investigation of the murder.See Monroe v. Angelone, No. 3:98CV254, 2002 U.S. Dist.LEXIS 26310, at *86-89 (E.D. Va.Mar. 28, 2002).She eventually dropped the ineffective assistance of counsel claim.Following the disposition of her habeas claim in federal district court, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit declined to hear the sufficiency of the evidence claim, finding "the district court's resolution of this claim is not 'debatable amongst jurists of reason."Monroe, 323 F.3d at 290 n.2.4.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In federal district court, Monroe also alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel and challenged the sufficiency of the evidence against her.She based her ineffective assistance of counsel claim on trial counsel's failure to challenge the voluntariness of her statements to a detective during the investigation of the murder.See Monroe v. Angelone, No. 3:98CV254, 2002 U.S. Dist.LEXIS 26310, at *86-89 (E.D. Va.Mar. 28, 2002).She eventually dropped the ineffective assistance of counsel claim.Following the disposition of her habeas claim in federal district court, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit declined to hear the sufficiency of the evidence claim, finding "the district court's resolution of this claim is not 'debatable amongst jurists of reason."Monroe, 323 F.3d at 290 n.2.4.

Key concepts: Petitioner, Habeas corpus, Law, Supreme court, Remand (court procedure), Political science, State (computer science), Trial court

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
AEDPA Deference and the Undeveloped State Factual Record: Monroe v. Angelone and New Evidence — Research Paper | ScholarLens