AEDPA Deference and the Undeveloped State Factual Record: Monroe v. Angelone and New Evidence
Rachel Wheeler
Abstract
Open-access reader
Rachel Wheeler
Abstract
Open-access reader
In federal district court, Monroe also alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel and challenged the sufficiency of the evidence against her.She based her ineffective assistance of counsel claim on trial counsel's failure to challenge the voluntariness of her statements to a detective during the investigation of the murder.See Monroe v. Angelone, No. 3:98CV254, 2002 U.S. Dist.LEXIS 26310, at *86-89 (E.D. Va.Mar. 28, 2002).She eventually dropped the ineffective assistance of counsel claim.Following the disposition of her habeas claim in federal district court, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit declined to hear the sufficiency of the evidence claim, finding "the district court's resolution of this claim is not 'debatable amongst jurists of reason."Monroe, 323 F.3d at 290 n.2.4.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In federal district court, Monroe also alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel and challenged the sufficiency of the evidence against her.She based her ineffective assistance of counsel claim on trial counsel's failure to challenge the voluntariness of her statements to a detective during the investigation of the murder.See Monroe v. Angelone, No. 3:98CV254, 2002 U.S. Dist.LEXIS 26310, at *86-89 (E.D. Va.Mar. 28, 2002).She eventually dropped the ineffective assistance of counsel claim.Following the disposition of her habeas claim in federal district court, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit declined to hear the sufficiency of the evidence claim, finding "the district court's resolution of this claim is not 'debatable amongst jurists of reason."Monroe, 323 F.3d at 290 n.2.4.
Key concepts: Petitioner, Habeas corpus, Law, Supreme court, Remand (court procedure), Political science, State (computer science), Trial court