1994Annals of Tropical Medicine and ParasitologyRequires access

Antipyretic efficacy of indomethacin and acetaminophen in uncomplicated falciparum malaria

Polrat Wilairatana, S Looareesuwan

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

The efficacy of indomethacin and acetaminophen as antipyretics was compared in 43 febrile patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive low oral doses of indomethacin (25 mg three times a day) or acetaminophen (1000 mg four times a day) as well as mefloquine. Oral temperature was measured before dosing and then every 4 h until apyrexia. Indomethacin was significantly quicker at clearing fever than acetaminophen (P < 0.05) and at reducing excessively high fever (> or = 39 degrees C) to a safer range (< 39 degrees C). No adverse effects were observed in either treatment group. The study shows that indomethacin is a potent antipyretic agent. It appears to be a safe alternative to acetaminophen for the treatment of febrile malarial patients who may benefit from antipyretic medication, including those unresponsive to treatment with acetaminophen.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The efficacy of indomethacin and acetaminophen as antipyretics was compared in 43 febrile patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive low oral doses of indomethacin (25 mg three times a day) or acetaminophen (1000 mg four times a day) as well as mefloquine. Oral temperature was measured before dosing and then every 4 h until apyrexia. Indomethacin was significantly quicker at clearing fever than acetaminophen (P < 0.05) and at reducing excessively high fever (> or = 39 degrees C) to a safer range (< 39 degrees C). No adverse effects were observed in either treatment group. The study shows that indomethacin is a potent antipyretic agent. It appears to be a safe alternative to acetaminophen for the treatment of febrile malarial patients who may benefit from antipyretic medication, including those unresponsive to treatment with acetaminophen.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The efficacy of indomethacin and acetaminophen as antipyretics was compared in 43 febrile patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive low oral doses of indomethacin (25 mg three times a day) or acetaminophen (1000 mg four times a day) as well as mefloquine. Oral temperature was measured before dosing and then every 4 h until apyrexia. Indomethacin was significantly quicker at clearing fever than acetaminophen (P < 0.05) and at reducing excessively high fever (> or = 39 degrees C) to a safer range (< 39 degrees C). No adverse effects were observed in either treatment group. The study shows that indomethacin is a potent antipyretic agent. It appears to be a safe alternative to acetaminophen for the treatment of febrile malarial patients who may benefit from antipyretic medication, including those unresponsive to treatment with acetaminophen.

Key concepts: Antipyretic, Acetaminophen, Medicine, Analgesic, Malaria, Adverse effect, Anesthesia, Mefloquine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Antipyretic efficacy of indomethacin and acetaminophen in uncomplicated falciparum malaria — Research Paper | ScholarLens