Historical representation of Gallipoli in the Australian curriculum
Heather Sharp
Abstract
Heather Sharp
Abstract
History curriculum has in recent years been the topic of much public interest, from debates within the history wars to issues related to content and pedagogical approaches within the new Australian Curriculum. This, in turn, has had an impact on History teaching within the school context, and is arguably a leading reason for the decision to incorporate History into the first phase of the Australian Curriculum (alongside other curriculum areas of Science, Maths and English).
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
History curriculum has in recent years been the topic of much public interest, from debates within the history wars to issues related to content and pedagogical approaches within the new Australian Curriculum. This, in turn, has had an impact on History teaching within the school context, and is arguably a leading reason for the decision to incorporate History into the first phase of the Australian Curriculum (alongside other curriculum areas of Science, Maths and English).
Key concepts: Curriculum, Context (archaeology), Representation (politics), Australian Curriculum, Curriculum theory, Pedagogy, Curriculum development, History