2017Unpublished venueOpen access

Near-Feasible Stable Matchings with Budget Constraints

Yasushi Kawase, Atsushi Iwasaki

Open full text 21 citations

Abstract

This paper deals with two-sided matching with budget constraints where one side (firm or hospital) can make monetary transfers (offer wages) to the other (worker or doctor). In a standard model, while multiple doctors can be matched to a single hospital, a hospital has a maximum quota: the number of doctors assigned to a hospital cannot exceed a certain limit. In our model, a hospital instead has a fixed budget: the total amount of wages allocated by each hospital to doctors is constrained. With budget constraints, stable matchings may fail to exist and checking the existence is hard. To deal with the nonexistence of stable matchings, we extend the “matching with contracts” model by Hatfield and Milgrom, so that it handles near-feasible matchings that exceeds each budget of the hospitals by a certain amount. We then propose two novel mechanisms that efficiently return such a near-feasible matching that is stable with respect to the actual amount of wages allocated by each hospital. In particular, by sacrificing strategy-proofness, our second mechanism achieves the best possible bound.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper deals with two-sided matching with budget constraints where one side (firm or hospital) can make monetary transfers (offer wages) to the other (worker or doctor). In a standard model, while multiple doctors can be matched to a single hospital, a hospital has a maximum quota: the number of doctors assigned to a hospital cannot exceed a certain limit. In our model, a hospital instead has a fixed budget: the total amount of wages allocated by each hospital to doctors is constrained. With budget constraints, stable matchings may fail to exist and checking the existence is hard. To deal with the nonexistence of stable matchings, we extend the “matching with contracts” model by Hatfield and Milgrom, so that it handles near-feasible matchings that exceeds each budget of the hospitals by a certain amount. We then propose two novel mechanisms that efficiently return such a near-feasible matching that is stable with respect to the actual amount of wages allocated by each hospital. In particular, by sacrificing strategy-proofness, our second mechanism achieves the best possible bound.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper deals with two-sided matching with budget constraints where one side (firm or hospital) can make monetary transfers (offer wages) to the other (worker or doctor). In a standard model, while multiple doctors can be matched to a single hospital, a hospital has a maximum quota: the number of doctors assigned to a hospital cannot exceed a certain limit. In our model, a hospital instead has a fixed budget: the total amount of wages allocated by each hospital to doctors is constrained. With budget constraints, stable matchings may fail to exist and checking the existence is hard. To deal with the nonexistence of stable matchings, we extend the “matching with contracts” model by Hatfield and Milgrom, so that it handles near-feasible matchings that exceeds each budget of the hospitals by a certain amount. We then propose two novel mechanisms that efficiently return such a near-feasible matching that is stable with respect to the actual amount of wages allocated by each hospital. In particular, by sacrificing strategy-proofness, our second mechanism achieves the best possible bound.

Key concepts: Budget constraint, Matching (statistics), Compatibility (geochemistry), Incentive compatibility, Constraint (computer-aided design), Mathematical optimization, Computer science, Mathematical economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Near-Feasible Stable Matchings with Budget Constraints — Research Paper | ScholarLens