2013•Unpublished venueRequires access

Virtue ethics and moral sentimentalism

Michael Anthony Slote

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Virtue ethics dominated the ancient philosophical world (at least in the West) and in recent decades has revived in a very strong way. e original impetus to that revival came from Elizabeth Anscombe (1958), who called for more attention to Aristotelian moral psychology and a more Aristotelian eventual approach to ethics itself, but although the recent revival of virtue ethics originally centred pretty much entirely around the ideas and in uence of Aristotle, other forms of virtue ethics eventually emerged: virtue ethics in uenced by the Stoics, by Hume and by Nietzsche. Of these newer forms of revived virtue ethics, only the Humean or sentimentalist variety seems to stand much of a chance of gaining wide philosophical acceptance in present-day circumstances. And the current possibilities for moral-sentimentalist virtue ethics have also led philosophers into more intense historical studies of Hume, and of his teacher, Francis Hutcheson, as virtue ethicists or as at least approximating to virtue ethicists.1

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Virtue ethics dominated the ancient philosophical world (at least in the West) and in recent decades has revived in a very strong way. e original impetus to that revival came from Elizabeth Anscombe (1958), who called for more attention to Aristotelian moral psychology and a more Aristotelian eventual approach to ethics itself, but although the recent revival of virtue ethics originally centred pretty much entirely around the ideas and in uence of Aristotle, other forms of virtue ethics eventually emerged: virtue ethics in uenced by the Stoics, by Hume and by Nietzsche. Of these newer forms of revived virtue ethics, only the Humean or sentimentalist variety seems to stand much of a chance of gaining wide philosophical acceptance in present-day circumstances. And the current possibilities for moral-sentimentalist virtue ethics have also led philosophers into more intense historical studies of Hume, and of his teacher, Francis Hutcheson, as virtue ethicists or as at least approximating to virtue ethicists.1

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Virtue ethics dominated the ancient philosophical world (at least in the West) and in recent decades has revived in a very strong way. e original impetus to that revival came from Elizabeth Anscombe (1958), who called for more attention to Aristotelian moral psychology and a more Aristotelian eventual approach to ethics itself, but although the recent revival of virtue ethics originally centred pretty much entirely around the ideas and in uence of Aristotle, other forms of virtue ethics eventually emerged: virtue ethics in uenced by the Stoics, by Hume and by Nietzsche. Of these newer forms of revived virtue ethics, only the Humean or sentimentalist variety seems to stand much of a chance of gaining wide philosophical acceptance in present-day circumstances. And the current possibilities for moral-sentimentalist virtue ethics have also led philosophers into more intense historical studies of Hume, and of his teacher, Francis Hutcheson, as virtue ethicists or as at least approximating to virtue ethicists.1

Key concepts: Virtue, Virtue ethics, Philosophy, Normative ethics, Epistemic virtue, Epistemology, Meta-ethics, Environmental ethics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Virtue ethics and moral sentimentalism — Research Paper | ScholarLens