Wills and estates: What to do with the family farm?: Family provision claims by grandchildren
Christopher Lawrence
Abstract
Christopher Lawrence
Abstract
In its recent decision in Chapple v Wilcox [2014] NSWCA 392, the NSW Court of Appeal set down a number of important principles for family provision claims by grandchildren under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). The decision is also of significance to cases involving other categories of eligible persons, and the question of costs in family provision cases where the plaintiff's claim is unsuccessful.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In its recent decision in Chapple v Wilcox [2014] NSWCA 392, the NSW Court of Appeal set down a number of important principles for family provision claims by grandchildren under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). The decision is also of significance to cases involving other categories of eligible persons, and the question of costs in family provision cases where the plaintiff's claim is unsuccessful.
Key concepts: Plaintiff, Appeal, Ecological succession, Law, Sociology, Actuarial science, Business, Political science