2017Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Neither Mute nor Inglorious

Kerri Andrews

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This essay considers Ann Yearsley’s engagement with the elegy, a form which made up a significant proportion of her total oeuvre, and with which she engaged throughout her career. The essay argues, following the lead of Donna Landry and William J. Christmas, the importance of considering laboring-class poetry in formal terms, and does this by locating Yearsley’s elegies within a larger tradition of elegiac poetry and exploring the ways in which Yearsley engages with, or not, the traditional requirements of such writing. In doing so it also considers the ways in which Yearsley’s elegiac poetry might contribute to, or form part of, an alternative female tradition of elegy: its conclusion explores the ways in which the intersection of Yearsley’s class and gender might have inflected her engagement with elegiac poetry. This essay also explores a number of recently-recovered and newly-discovered poems by Yearsley, and offers the first critical discussion of several of them.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This essay considers Ann Yearsley’s engagement with the elegy, a form which made up a significant proportion of her total oeuvre, and with which she engaged throughout her career. The essay argues, following the lead of Donna Landry and William J. Christmas, the importance of considering laboring-class poetry in formal terms, and does this by locating Yearsley’s elegies within a larger tradition of elegiac poetry and exploring the ways in which Yearsley engages with, or not, the traditional requirements of such writing. In doing so it also considers the ways in which Yearsley’s elegiac poetry might contribute to, or form part of, an alternative female tradition of elegy: its conclusion explores the ways in which the intersection of Yearsley’s class and gender might have inflected her engagement with elegiac poetry. This essay also explores a number of recently-recovered and newly-discovered poems by Yearsley, and offers the first critical discussion of several of them.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This essay considers Ann Yearsley’s engagement with the elegy, a form which made up a significant proportion of her total oeuvre, and with which she engaged throughout her career. The essay argues, following the lead of Donna Landry and William J. Christmas, the importance of considering laboring-class poetry in formal terms, and does this by locating Yearsley’s elegies within a larger tradition of elegiac poetry and exploring the ways in which Yearsley engages with, or not, the traditional requirements of such writing. In doing so it also considers the ways in which Yearsley’s elegiac poetry might contribute to, or form part of, an alternative female tradition of elegy: its conclusion explores the ways in which the intersection of Yearsley’s class and gender might have inflected her engagement with elegiac poetry. This essay also explores a number of recently-recovered and newly-discovered poems by Yearsley, and offers the first critical discussion of several of them.

Key concepts: Elegy, Elegiac, Poetry, Literature, Art, Class (philosophy), Philosophy, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Neither Mute nor Inglorious — Research Paper | ScholarLens