2018Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

Corporate law and the history of corporate social responsibility

Lyman Johnson

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Chapter 21 looks at the development of US corporation law in relation to larger demands for corporate social responsibility, and finds a paradox: since the late nineteenth century, even as the large corporation was increasingly recognized as having a distinct existence as a legal person, and came to wield increasing influence on a range of stakeholders, from employees to communities to the environment, corporation law narrowed its concern to the relationship between management and shareholders. Paralleling these developments, corporate theory by the late twentieth century largely disregarded the existence of a distinct corporate personality and emphasized instead a view of the corporation as simply an aggregate (‘nexus’) of freely associated individuals. Following these developments, corporate social responsibility has been left to bodies of law outside corporate law, or to evolving sets of norms and practices outside the law altogether.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Chapter 21 looks at the development of US corporation law in relation to larger demands for corporate social responsibility, and finds a paradox: since the late nineteenth century, even as the large corporation was increasingly recognized as having a distinct existence as a legal person, and came to wield increasing influence on a range of stakeholders, from employees to communities to the environment, corporation law narrowed its concern to the relationship between management and shareholders. Paralleling these developments, corporate theory by the late twentieth century largely disregarded the existence of a distinct corporate personality and emphasized instead a view of the corporation as simply an aggregate (‘nexus’) of freely associated individuals. Following these developments, corporate social responsibility has been left to bodies of law outside corporate law, or to evolving sets of norms and practices outside the law altogether.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Chapter 21 looks at the development of US corporation law in relation to larger demands for corporate social responsibility, and finds a paradox: since the late nineteenth century, even as the large corporation was increasingly recognized as having a distinct existence as a legal person, and came to wield increasing influence on a range of stakeholders, from employees to communities to the environment, corporation law narrowed its concern to the relationship between management and shareholders. Paralleling these developments, corporate theory by the late twentieth century largely disregarded the existence of a distinct corporate personality and emphasized instead a view of the corporation as simply an aggregate (‘nexus’) of freely associated individuals. Following these developments, corporate social responsibility has been left to bodies of law outside corporate law, or to evolving sets of norms and practices outside the law altogether.

Key concepts: Corporation, Corporate law, Corporate social responsibility, Shareholder, Corporate governance, Nexus (standard), Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Corporate law and the history of corporate social responsibility — Research Paper | ScholarLens