1996PubMedRequires access

[Which technic for which form of hypospadias?].

W A De Sy

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Based on our experience of 700 interventions for hypospadias from 1980 to 1995, the author describes the important factors to take in consideration to decide upon the ultimate technique to use. This choice is quiet easy for a mild or severe hypospadias, and is essentially based on the use of the Transverse Island Flap, used as a tube or as on Onlay, depending the existence of chordee and curvature, the surface of the prepuce and the length of the urethral defect. For cases of distal hypospadias, the choice of the right technique is even more difficult. Factors to be considered are, chordee or not, aspect and localisation of the meatus, the shape and the volume of the glans, the quality of skin recovering the distal urethra and presence or not of corpus spongiosum at the level of the distal urethra. The author discusses the importance of all this parameters, combined or not, in the choice of which technique for which hypospadias.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Based on our experience of 700 interventions for hypospadias from 1980 to 1995, the author describes the important factors to take in consideration to decide upon the ultimate technique to use. This choice is quiet easy for a mild or severe hypospadias, and is essentially based on the use of the Transverse Island Flap, used as a tube or as on Onlay, depending the existence of chordee and curvature, the surface of the prepuce and the length of the urethral defect. For cases of distal hypospadias, the choice of the right technique is even more difficult. Factors to be considered are, chordee or not, aspect and localisation of the meatus, the shape and the volume of the glans, the quality of skin recovering the distal urethra and presence or not of corpus spongiosum at the level of the distal urethra. The author discusses the importance of all this parameters, combined or not, in the choice of which technique for which hypospadias.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Based on our experience of 700 interventions for hypospadias from 1980 to 1995, the author describes the important factors to take in consideration to decide upon the ultimate technique to use. This choice is quiet easy for a mild or severe hypospadias, and is essentially based on the use of the Transverse Island Flap, used as a tube or as on Onlay, depending the existence of chordee and curvature, the surface of the prepuce and the length of the urethral defect. For cases of distal hypospadias, the choice of the right technique is even more difficult. Factors to be considered are, chordee or not, aspect and localisation of the meatus, the shape and the volume of the glans, the quality of skin recovering the distal urethra and presence or not of corpus spongiosum at the level of the distal urethra. The author discusses the importance of all this parameters, combined or not, in the choice of which technique for which hypospadias.

Key concepts: Hypospadias, Chordee, Medicine, Glans, Urethra, Meatus, Corpus Spongiosum, Urethroplasty

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Which technic for which form of hypospadias?]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens