2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Effect of dentifrices pH on enamel remineralization in vitro

Kristina Goršeta, Vesna Ambarkova, Domagoj Glavina, Ilija Škrinjarić

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM Demineralization and remineralization equilibrium of enamel depends on salivary Ca and P concentration, bioavailability of fluoride and pH. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of pH of dentifrices with different fluoride formula on enamel remineralization using surface microhardness test. METHODS Enamel blocks were ground flat with water-cooled carborundum discs (320, 600 and 1200 grit) and divided into seven groups. The specimens were subjected to a daily cycling regime comprising two one-minute brushing treatments ; one before and one after demineralization period of 6 hours and 18 hours, and remineralization in artificial saliva. Enamel blocks were treated with fluoride dentifrices: Sensodyne Rapid (pH 6.7), Colgate Total (pH 7.3), Parodontax fluoride (pH 7.9), Sensodyne fluoride (pH 5.4), Pronamel Sensodyne (pH 7.1), Elmex-GABA International (pH 4.8), and fluoride free Detartrine Paste (pH 8.6). The surface microhardness (SMH) was determined at baseline and after 12 days using HMV-2000 (50 g, 490.3 mN, 10 s) (Shimadzu, Japan). RESULTS All specimen groups treated with fluorides showed increase in SMH compared to control group. Dentifrices with lower pH (Sensodyne F, Sensodyne Rapid, Pronamel) were statistically superior to other fluoride dentifrices and a fluoride-free control after 12 days pH-cycling regime (p 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Results obtained in the present study show that slightly acidified fluoridated dentifrices may have a certain effect on enamel remineralization.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM Demineralization and remineralization equilibrium of enamel depends on salivary Ca and P concentration, bioavailability of fluoride and pH. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of pH of dentifrices with different fluoride formula on enamel remineralization using surface microhardness test. METHODS Enamel blocks were ground flat with water-cooled carborundum discs (320, 600 and 1200 grit) and divided into seven groups. The specimens were subjected to a daily cycling regime comprising two one-minute brushing treatments ; one before and one after demineralization period of 6 hours and 18 hours, and remineralization in artificial saliva. Enamel blocks were treated with fluoride dentifrices: Sensodyne Rapid (pH 6.7), Colgate Total (pH 7.3), Parodontax fluoride (pH 7.9), Sensodyne fluoride (pH 5.4), Pronamel Sensodyne (pH 7.1), Elmex-GABA International (pH 4.8), and fluoride free Detartrine Paste (pH 8.6). The surface microhardness (SMH) was determined at baseline and after 12 days using HMV-2000 (50 g, 490.3 mN, 10 s) (Shimadzu, Japan). RESULTS All specimen groups treated with fluorides showed increase in SMH compared to control group. Dentifrices with lower pH (Sensodyne F, Sensodyne Rapid, Pronamel) were statistically superior to other fluoride dentifrices and a fluoride-free control after 12 days pH-cycling regime (p 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Results obtained in the present study show that slightly acidified fluoridated dentifrices may have a certain effect on enamel remineralization.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM Demineralization and remineralization equilibrium of enamel depends on salivary Ca and P concentration, bioavailability of fluoride and pH. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of pH of dentifrices with different fluoride formula on enamel remineralization using surface microhardness test. METHODS Enamel blocks were ground flat with water-cooled carborundum discs (320, 600 and 1200 grit) and divided into seven groups. The specimens were subjected to a daily cycling regime comprising two one-minute brushing treatments ; one before and one after demineralization period of 6 hours and 18 hours, and remineralization in artificial saliva. Enamel blocks were treated with fluoride dentifrices: Sensodyne Rapid (pH 6.7), Colgate Total (pH 7.3), Parodontax fluoride (pH 7.9), Sensodyne fluoride (pH 5.4), Pronamel Sensodyne (pH 7.1), Elmex-GABA International (pH 4.8), and fluoride free Detartrine Paste (pH 8.6). The surface microhardness (SMH) was determined at baseline and after 12 days using HMV-2000 (50 g, 490.3 mN, 10 s) (Shimadzu, Japan). RESULTS All specimen groups treated with fluorides showed increase in SMH compared to control group. Dentifrices with lower pH (Sensodyne F, Sensodyne Rapid, Pronamel) were statistically superior to other fluoride dentifrices and a fluoride-free control after 12 days pH-cycling regime (p 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Results obtained in the present study show that slightly acidified fluoridated dentifrices may have a certain effect on enamel remineralization.

Key concepts: Remineralisation, Demineralization, Fluoride, Dentifrice, Enamel paint, Chemistry, Saliva, Tooth Remineralization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of dentifrices pH on enamel remineralization in vitro — Research Paper | ScholarLens