2016Unpublished venueRequires access

A Comparison Study of Ridge Regression and Principle Component Regression with Application

Gariballa Abdelmageed Abdelgadir, Hussein Yousif Eledum

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the multicollinearity problem in regression models and presents some typical ways of handling the collinearity problem. In Addition, the paper attempts to compare RR , and PCR and LS methods using minimum squared error MSE and the accuracy of the prediction. The results of this paper showed that, RR  method performs better than PCR and LS methods , because RR had minimum MSE and a higher predicted accuracy than other methods. The results of this paper showed that, based on the criteria of model accuracy PCR performs better than RR, whereas, according to mean squares errors criterion MSE , RR performs slightly better. In general, the two biased estimator RR and PCR perform better than LS. Keywords : Least Squares; Correlation Matrix; Multicollinearity; Ridge Regression; Principal Component Regression.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the multicollinearity problem in regression models and presents some typical ways of handling the collinearity problem. In Addition, the paper attempts to compare RR , and PCR and LS methods using minimum squared error MSE and the accuracy of the prediction. The results of this paper showed that, RR  method performs better than PCR and LS methods , because RR had minimum MSE and a higher predicted accuracy than other methods. The results of this paper showed that, based on the criteria of model accuracy PCR performs better than RR, whereas, according to mean squares errors criterion MSE , RR performs slightly better. In general, the two biased estimator RR and PCR perform better than LS. Keywords : Least Squares; Correlation Matrix; Multicollinearity; Ridge Regression; Principal Component Regression.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the multicollinearity problem in regression models and presents some typical ways of handling the collinearity problem. In Addition, the paper attempts to compare RR , and PCR and LS methods using minimum squared error MSE and the accuracy of the prediction. The results of this paper showed that, RR  method performs better than PCR and LS methods , because RR had minimum MSE and a higher predicted accuracy than other methods. The results of this paper showed that, based on the criteria of model accuracy PCR performs better than RR, whereas, according to mean squares errors criterion MSE , RR performs slightly better. In general, the two biased estimator RR and PCR perform better than LS. Keywords : Least Squares; Correlation Matrix; Multicollinearity; Ridge Regression; Principal Component Regression.

Key concepts: Multicollinearity, Collinearity, Principal component regression, Statistics, Mathematics, Regression, Mean squared error, Estimator

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison Study of Ridge Regression and Principle Component Regression with Application — Research Paper | ScholarLens