2014Unpublished venueRequires access

A Note on Partial Least Squares Regression for Multicollinearity (A Comparative Study)

Moawad El-Fallah, Abd El-Salam

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

This paper presents and compares the partial least squares (PLS) regression as an alternative procedure for handling multicollinearity problem with two commonly used regression methods, which are ridge regression (RR) and principle component regression (PCR) .The performances of RR, PCR and PLS are compared to help and give future researchers a comprehensive view about the best procedure to handle multicollinearity problem. A Monte Carlo simulation study was used to evaluate the effectiveness of these three procedures. For comparison purposes, mean squared errors (MSE) were calculated the analysis including all simulations and calculations were done using statistical package S-Plus 2000 software. The results of this paper show that, the performances of RR are most efficient when the number of regressors is small, while the PLS is most efficient than others when the number of regressors is moderate and high.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents and compares the partial least squares (PLS) regression as an alternative procedure for handling multicollinearity problem with two commonly used regression methods, which are ridge regression (RR) and principle component regression (PCR) .The performances of RR, PCR and PLS are compared to help and give future researchers a comprehensive view about the best procedure to handle multicollinearity problem. A Monte Carlo simulation study was used to evaluate the effectiveness of these three procedures. For comparison purposes, mean squared errors (MSE) were calculated the analysis including all simulations and calculations were done using statistical package S-Plus 2000 software. The results of this paper show that, the performances of RR are most efficient when the number of regressors is small, while the PLS is most efficient than others when the number of regressors is moderate and high.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents and compares the partial least squares (PLS) regression as an alternative procedure for handling multicollinearity problem with two commonly used regression methods, which are ridge regression (RR) and principle component regression (PCR) .The performances of RR, PCR and PLS are compared to help and give future researchers a comprehensive view about the best procedure to handle multicollinearity problem. A Monte Carlo simulation study was used to evaluate the effectiveness of these three procedures. For comparison purposes, mean squared errors (MSE) were calculated the analysis including all simulations and calculations were done using statistical package S-Plus 2000 software. The results of this paper show that, the performances of RR are most efficient when the number of regressors is small, while the PLS is most efficient than others when the number of regressors is moderate and high.

Key concepts: Multicollinearity, Partial least squares regression, Statistics, Mathematics, Regression analysis, Regression, Principal component regression, Variance inflation factor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Note on Partial Least Squares Regression for Multicollinearity (A Comparative Study) — Research Paper | ScholarLens