2017The International Journal of Acoustics and VibrationOpen access

Control and Analysis of a Magnetorheological Energy Absorber for both Shock and Vibration

Xian–Xu Bai, Norman V. Wereley, Dai‐Hua Wang

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

In this paper, the shock and vibration control effectiveness of the systems based on the magnetorheological (MR) energy absorber (EA) with an internal bypass is investigated and compared with a conventional MREA with an identical volume, the MREA with an internal bypass at passive-on state, and a passive EA based systems.The mechanical model of the single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) shock and vibration control systems using these four EAs is constructed and the governing equation for the SDOF system is derived.A skyhook control algorithm is used to validate the shock and vibration control performance of the systems.The control performances of the systems under shock loads due to vertical impulses (the maximal initial velocity is as high as 10 m/s) and sinusoidal vibrations are evaluated, compared, and analyzed.The research results indicate that compared to the other three systems, the MREA with an internal bypass based system provides much better vibration control performance, and for the vertical shock control, the MREA with an internal bypass based system requires the shortest settling time to reach steady state and needs shortest travelling stroke.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper, the shock and vibration control effectiveness of the systems based on the magnetorheological (MR) energy absorber (EA) with an internal bypass is investigated and compared with a conventional MREA with an identical volume, the MREA with an internal bypass at passive-on state, and a passive EA based systems.The mechanical model of the single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) shock and vibration control systems using these four EAs is constructed and the governing equation for the SDOF system is derived.A skyhook control algorithm is used to validate the shock and vibration control performance of the systems.The control performances of the systems under shock loads due to vertical impulses (the maximal initial velocity is as high as 10 m/s) and sinusoidal vibrations are evaluated, compared, and analyzed.The research results indicate that compared to the other three systems, the MREA with an internal bypass based system provides much better vibration control performance, and for the vertical shock control, the MREA with an internal bypass based system requires the shortest settling time to reach steady state and needs shortest travelling stroke.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper, the shock and vibration control effectiveness of the systems based on the magnetorheological (MR) energy absorber (EA) with an internal bypass is investigated and compared with a conventional MREA with an identical volume, the MREA with an internal bypass at passive-on state, and a passive EA based systems.The mechanical model of the single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) shock and vibration control systems using these four EAs is constructed and the governing equation for the SDOF system is derived.A skyhook control algorithm is used to validate the shock and vibration control performance of the systems.The control performances of the systems under shock loads due to vertical impulses (the maximal initial velocity is as high as 10 m/s) and sinusoidal vibrations are evaluated, compared, and analyzed.The research results indicate that compared to the other three systems, the MREA with an internal bypass based system provides much better vibration control performance, and for the vertical shock control, the MREA with an internal bypass based system requires the shortest settling time to reach steady state and needs shortest travelling stroke.

Key concepts: Magnetorheological fluid, Shock absorber, Vibration, Shock (circulatory), Structural engineering, Materials science, Vibration control, Magnetorheological damper

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Control and Analysis of a Magnetorheological Energy Absorber for both Shock and Vibration — Research Paper | ScholarLens