2015•CiiT international journal of programmable device circuits and systemsRequires access

Performance Comparison of Different 8-bit Multipliers

Brita K. Aslaliya, Anurag Lakhlani

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In today’s era a multiplier is a one of the key component of large number of systems such as micro-processors, digital signal processor, FIR (Finite Impulse Response) filters etc. Performance of multiplier of any system determined the performance of that system because the multiplier is generally slowest element and most area consuming. In this paper we compare three 8-bit multipliers such as Shift and Add multiplier, Booth multiplier and Vedic multiplier with the concentration on two key parameters Delay and Area. Different multipliers are synthesized and simulated on Xilinx 14.7 ISE Simulator and implemented on FPGA Spartan-6, xc6slx25t device. Shift and Add multiplier has a delay of 15.232ns, Booth multiplier has a 20.643ns and Vedic multiplier (Vertically and crosswise) has 12.651 ns of delay. Numbers of LUTs occupy by Shift and Add, Booth and Vedic multiplier are 88, 183 and 73 respectively. The result of this paper helps to choose a better multiplier from available options for fabricating different systems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In today’s era a multiplier is a one of the key component of large number of systems such as micro-processors, digital signal processor, FIR (Finite Impulse Response) filters etc. Performance of multiplier of any system determined the performance of that system because the multiplier is generally slowest element and most area consuming. In this paper we compare three 8-bit multipliers such as Shift and Add multiplier, Booth multiplier and Vedic multiplier with the concentration on two key parameters Delay and Area. Different multipliers are synthesized and simulated on Xilinx 14.7 ISE Simulator and implemented on FPGA Spartan-6, xc6slx25t device. Shift and Add multiplier has a delay of 15.232ns, Booth multiplier has a 20.643ns and Vedic multiplier (Vertically and crosswise) has 12.651 ns of delay. Numbers of LUTs occupy by Shift and Add, Booth and Vedic multiplier are 88, 183 and 73 respectively. The result of this paper helps to choose a better multiplier from available options for fabricating different systems.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In today’s era a multiplier is a one of the key component of large number of systems such as micro-processors, digital signal processor, FIR (Finite Impulse Response) filters etc. Performance of multiplier of any system determined the performance of that system because the multiplier is generally slowest element and most area consuming. In this paper we compare three 8-bit multipliers such as Shift and Add multiplier, Booth multiplier and Vedic multiplier with the concentration on two key parameters Delay and Area. Different multipliers are synthesized and simulated on Xilinx 14.7 ISE Simulator and implemented on FPGA Spartan-6, xc6slx25t device. Shift and Add multiplier has a delay of 15.232ns, Booth multiplier has a 20.643ns and Vedic multiplier (Vertically and crosswise) has 12.651 ns of delay. Numbers of LUTs occupy by Shift and Add, Booth and Vedic multiplier are 88, 183 and 73 respectively. The result of this paper helps to choose a better multiplier from available options for fabricating different systems.

Key concepts: Multiplier (economics), Arithmetic, Field-programmable gate array, Booth's multiplication algorithm, Mathematics, Computer science, Computer hardware, Electronic engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance Comparison of Different 8-bit Multipliers — Research Paper | ScholarLens