2016SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Were the Ancient Greeks Epistemic Democrats

Daniela Cammack

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Epistemic defences of democracy are increasingly popular. These defences are typically advanced on philosophical grounds, but the ancient Greeks are said to provide historical support. This article challenges that claim. It argues, first, that there is no evidence to suggest that the ancient Greeks stressed the role of knowledge in decision-making, the crux of the epistemic view. Next, it examines the distinction between knowledge (epistēmē), understood as information that exists independently of our will, and judgment (gnomē or krisis), understood as a view produced by and inextricably linked to particular willing agents, and shows that the ancient Greeks consistently conceived of political decision-making in terms of the latter rather than the former. Finally, taking Athens’ relations with the Melians and the rise of Macedonia as examples of significant political problems, it suggests that the ancient Greek view shows a better grasp of the inherently creative character of political action.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Epistemic defences of democracy are increasingly popular. These defences are typically advanced on philosophical grounds, but the ancient Greeks are said to provide historical support. This article challenges that claim. It argues, first, that there is no evidence to suggest that the ancient Greeks stressed the role of knowledge in decision-making, the crux of the epistemic view. Next, it examines the distinction between knowledge (epistēmē), understood as information that exists independently of our will, and judgment (gnomē or krisis), understood as a view produced by and inextricably linked to particular willing agents, and shows that the ancient Greeks consistently conceived of political decision-making in terms of the latter rather than the former. Finally, taking Athens’ relations with the Melians and the rise of Macedonia as examples of significant political problems, it suggests that the ancient Greek view shows a better grasp of the inherently creative character of political action.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Epistemic defences of democracy are increasingly popular. These defences are typically advanced on philosophical grounds, but the ancient Greeks are said to provide historical support. This article challenges that claim. It argues, first, that there is no evidence to suggest that the ancient Greeks stressed the role of knowledge in decision-making, the crux of the epistemic view. Next, it examines the distinction between knowledge (epistēmē), understood as information that exists independently of our will, and judgment (gnomē or krisis), understood as a view produced by and inextricably linked to particular willing agents, and shows that the ancient Greeks consistently conceived of political decision-making in terms of the latter rather than the former. Finally, taking Athens’ relations with the Melians and the rise of Macedonia as examples of significant political problems, it suggests that the ancient Greek view shows a better grasp of the inherently creative character of political action.

Key concepts: Greeks, Politics, Ancient Greek, Epistemology, GRASP, Democracy, Action (physics), Political action

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Were the Ancient Greeks Epistemic Democrats — Research Paper | ScholarLens