1998Argumentation and AdvocacyRequires access

Knowledge and Performance in Argument: Disciplinarity and Proto-Theory

John Lyne

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Studies in the rhetoric of science share a common ancestry with studies in epistemic rhetoric, namely, the analysis of arguments. Recognizing this lineage makes it less likely that rhetoric of science will be absorbed by other disciplinary projects. Scientific arguments thematize the pursuit of knowledge, and are invented and performed within an interplay of knowing and doubting. That interplay is structured by disciplines in the academy, and by proto-theory in the general culture.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Studies in the rhetoric of science share a common ancestry with studies in epistemic rhetoric, namely, the analysis of arguments. Recognizing this lineage makes it less likely that rhetoric of science will be absorbed by other disciplinary projects. Scientific arguments thematize the pursuit of knowledge, and are invented and performed within an interplay of knowing and doubting. That interplay is structured by disciplines in the academy, and by proto-theory in the general culture.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Studies in the rhetoric of science share a common ancestry with studies in epistemic rhetoric, namely, the analysis of arguments. Recognizing this lineage makes it less likely that rhetoric of science will be absorbed by other disciplinary projects. Scientific arguments thematize the pursuit of knowledge, and are invented and performed within an interplay of knowing and doubting. That interplay is structured by disciplines in the academy, and by proto-theory in the general culture.

Key concepts: Rhetoric, Epistemology, Discipline, Argument (complex analysis), Sociology, Science studies, History of science, Social science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Knowledge and Performance in Argument: Disciplinarity and Proto-Theory — Research Paper | ScholarLens