Knowledge and Performance in Argument: Disciplinarity and Proto-Theory
John Lyne
Abstract
John Lyne
Abstract
Studies in the rhetoric of science share a common ancestry with studies in epistemic rhetoric, namely, the analysis of arguments. Recognizing this lineage makes it less likely that rhetoric of science will be absorbed by other disciplinary projects. Scientific arguments thematize the pursuit of knowledge, and are invented and performed within an interplay of knowing and doubting. That interplay is structured by disciplines in the academy, and by proto-theory in the general culture.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Studies in the rhetoric of science share a common ancestry with studies in epistemic rhetoric, namely, the analysis of arguments. Recognizing this lineage makes it less likely that rhetoric of science will be absorbed by other disciplinary projects. Scientific arguments thematize the pursuit of knowledge, and are invented and performed within an interplay of knowing and doubting. That interplay is structured by disciplines in the academy, and by proto-theory in the general culture.
Key concepts: Rhetoric, Epistemology, Discipline, Argument (complex analysis), Sociology, Science studies, History of science, Social science