THE FLAPS AND WING LEADING EDGE
H. C. Mclemore
Abstract
H. C. Mclemore
Abstract
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATIONNASA MEMO IO-II-58LAERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS IN SIDESLIP OF ALARGE-SCA_ 49° SWEPTBACK WING-BODY-TAILCONFIGURATION WITH BLOWING APPLIED OVERTHE FLAPS AND WING LEADING EDGE*By H. Clyde McLemoreSUMMARYAn investigation has been conducted in the Langley full-scale tun-nel to determine the aerodynamic characteristics in sideslip of a large-scale 49° sweptback wing-body-tail configuration having wing leading-edge and flap-blowing boundary-layer control. The wing and tails hadan aspect ratio of 3.5, a taper ratio of 0.3, and NACA 65A006 airfoilsections parallel to the plane of symmetry. The tests were conductedover a range of angles of attack of about -5° to 28° for sideslip anglesof 0°, -5.06 °, -10.15 °, and -15.18 °. Lateral and longitudinal stabilityand control characteristics were obtained for a minimized blowing rate.The Reynolds number of the tests was 5.2 X 106 , corresponding to a Machnumber of 0.08.The results of the investigation showed that sideslip to angles ofabout -15° did not require, from a consideration of the longitudinalcharacteristics, blowing rates over the wing leading edge or flap greaterthan that established as minimum at zero sideslip. The optimum con-figurationwas laterally and directionally stable through the completelift-coefficient range including the stall; however, maximum lift forsideslip angles greater than about 5° was seriously limited by a defi-ciency of lateral control. Blowing over the leading edge of the retreatingwing in sideslip at a rate greater than that established as minimum atzero sideslip was ineffective in improving the lateral control character-istics. The optimum configuration at zero sideslip had no hysteresisof the aerodynamic parameters upon recovery from stall.*Title, Unclassified.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATIONNASA MEMO IO-II-58LAERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS IN SIDESLIP OF ALARGE-SCA_ 49° SWEPTBACK WING-BODY-TAILCONFIGURATION WITH BLOWING APPLIED OVERTHE FLAPS AND WING LEADING EDGE*By H. Clyde McLemoreSUMMARYAn investigation has been conducted in the Langley full-scale tun-nel to determine the aerodynamic characteristics in sideslip of a large-scale 49° sweptback wing-body-tail configuration having wing leading-edge and flap-blowing boundary-layer control. The wing and tails hadan aspect ratio of 3.5, a taper ratio of 0.3, and NACA 65A006 airfoilsections parallel to the plane of symmetry. The tests were conductedover a range of angles of attack of about -5° to 28° for sideslip anglesof 0°, -5.06 °, -10.15 °, and -15.18 °. Lateral and longitudinal stabilityand control characteristics were obtained for a minimized blowing rate.The Reynolds number of the tests was 5.2 X 106 , corresponding to a Machnumber of 0.08.The results of the investigation showed that sideslip to angles ofabout -15° did not require, from a consideration of the longitudinalcharacteristics, blowing rates over the wing leading edge or flap greaterthan that established as minimum at zero sideslip. The optimum con-figurationwas laterally and directionally stable through the completelift-coefficient range including the stall; however, maximum lift forsideslip angles greater than about 5° was seriously limited by a defi-ciency of lateral control. Blowing over the leading edge of the retreatingwing in sideslip at a rate greater than that established as minimum atzero sideslip was ineffective in improving the lateral control character-istics. The optimum configuration at zero sideslip had no hysteresisof the aerodynamic parameters upon recovery from stall.*Title, Unclassified.
Key concepts: Wing, Stall (fluid mechanics), Angle of attack, Leading edge, Wing twist, Wing configuration, Wing loading, Lift coefficient