2014Journal of Institute of Medicine NepalOpen access

Success Rate of Simple Underlay Myringoplasty in Smaller Perforation of Tympanic Membrane

Rb Pradhananga

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of the study was to compare the success rate of Simple Underlay Myringoplasty (SUM) in smaller perforation of tympanic membrane (TM) with that of Conventional Underlay Myringoplasty. Methods: It was a prospective, longitudinal study on 46 patients of more than 15 years of age with Chronic Otitis Media Mucosal type with the small and medium sized perforations. The patients with average hearing loss more than 30 dB were excluded from the study. The patients were randomized into two groups: group A- who underwent SUM (26 patients) and group B-who underwent Conventional Myringoplasty (20 patients). The patients were followed up on 6th, 8th and 10th post operative week for the assessment of the status of the graft. The status was described as; intact TM, graft with residual pin point perforation and total rejection of the graft with remaining perforation. Results: There was no statistical difference in graft status between SUM and Conventional Myringoplasty in all the three post operative follow up (p value = 0.121, 0.279 and 1.0 in 6th, 8th and 10th week of follow up respectively). Conclusion: Simple Underlay Myringoplasty has comparable success rate (88.46%, 23/26) as Conventional Underlay Myringoplasty (90.0%, 18/20).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: The objective of the study was to compare the success rate of Simple Underlay Myringoplasty (SUM) in smaller perforation of tympanic membrane (TM) with that of Conventional Underlay Myringoplasty. Methods: It was a prospective, longitudinal study on 46 patients of more than 15 years of age with Chronic Otitis Media Mucosal type with the small and medium sized perforations. The patients with average hearing loss more than 30 dB were excluded from the study. The patients were randomized into two groups: group A- who underwent SUM (26 patients) and group B-who underwent Conventional Myringoplasty (20 patients). The patients were followed up on 6th, 8th and 10th post operative week for the assessment of the status of the graft. The status was described as; intact TM, graft with residual pin point perforation and total rejection of the graft with remaining perforation. Results: There was no statistical difference in graft status between SUM and Conventional Myringoplasty in all the three post operative follow up (p value = 0.121, 0.279 and 1.0 in 6th, 8th and 10th week of follow up respectively). Conclusion: Simple Underlay Myringoplasty has comparable success rate (88.46%, 23/26) as Conventional Underlay Myringoplasty (90.0%, 18/20).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: The objective of the study was to compare the success rate of Simple Underlay Myringoplasty (SUM) in smaller perforation of tympanic membrane (TM) with that of Conventional Underlay Myringoplasty. Methods: It was a prospective, longitudinal study on 46 patients of more than 15 years of age with Chronic Otitis Media Mucosal type with the small and medium sized perforations. The patients with average hearing loss more than 30 dB were excluded from the study. The patients were randomized into two groups: group A- who underwent SUM (26 patients) and group B-who underwent Conventional Myringoplasty (20 patients). The patients were followed up on 6th, 8th and 10th post operative week for the assessment of the status of the graft. The status was described as; intact TM, graft with residual pin point perforation and total rejection of the graft with remaining perforation. Results: There was no statistical difference in graft status between SUM and Conventional Myringoplasty in all the three post operative follow up (p value = 0.121, 0.279 and 1.0 in 6th, 8th and 10th week of follow up respectively). Conclusion: Simple Underlay Myringoplasty has comparable success rate (88.46%, 23/26) as Conventional Underlay Myringoplasty (90.0%, 18/20).

Key concepts: Myringoplasty, Underlay, Medicine, Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Perforation, Surgery, Tympanoplasty, Telecommunications

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Success Rate of Simple Underlay Myringoplasty in Smaller Perforation of Tympanic Membrane — Research Paper | ScholarLens