2017Journal of Intellectual Property Law & PracticeRequires access

US Supreme Court clarifies lost profit remedy for design patent infringement

Charles R. Macedo, Jessica A. Capasso, Michael Sebba

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

On 6 December 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd et al v Apple Inc, unanimously reversing the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which had affirmed the award to Apple of $399 million in damages for Samsung’s design patent infringement—the entire profit Samsung had made from its sales of infringing smartphones. The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Federal Circuit as inconsistent with Section 289 of the Patent Act and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the court.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

On 6 December 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd et al v Apple Inc, unanimously reversing the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which had affirmed the award to Apple of $399 million in damages for Samsung’s design patent infringement—the entire profit Samsung had made from its sales of infringing smartphones. The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Federal Circuit as inconsistent with Section 289 of the Patent Act and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the court.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

On 6 December 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd et al v Apple Inc, unanimously reversing the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which had affirmed the award to Apple of $399 million in damages for Samsung’s design patent infringement—the entire profit Samsung had made from its sales of infringing smartphones. The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Federal Circuit as inconsistent with Section 289 of the Patent Act and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the court.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Patent infringement, Damages, Law, Patent troll, Profit (economics), Majority opinion, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
US Supreme Court clarifies lost profit remedy for design patent infringement — Research Paper | ScholarLens