2017Unpublished venueOpen access

Powering Reproducible Research

Katherine S. Button, Marcus R. Munafò

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

The widely used null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) framework grew out of the distinct statistical theories of Fisher, and Neyman and Pearson. From Fisher, this chapter considers the concept of null hypothesis testing, and from Neyman-Pearson the concepts of Type I (α) and Type II error (β). Power is a concept arising from Neyman-Pearson theory, and reflects the likelihood of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis (i.e., 1 - β). However, the hybrid statistical theory typically used leans most heavily on Fisher's concept of null hypothesis testing. Within the hybrid NHST framework that continues to dominate within psychological science, the power of a statistical test is the probability that the test will correctly reject the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is genuinely false. Low power may therefore contribute to the poor reproducibility of scientific findings, which continues to be a cause of concern.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The widely used null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) framework grew out of the distinct statistical theories of Fisher, and Neyman and Pearson. From Fisher, this chapter considers the concept of null hypothesis testing, and from Neyman-Pearson the concepts of Type I (α) and Type II error (β). Power is a concept arising from Neyman-Pearson theory, and reflects the likelihood of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis (i.e., 1 - β). However, the hybrid statistical theory typically used leans most heavily on Fisher's concept of null hypothesis testing. Within the hybrid NHST framework that continues to dominate within psychological science, the power of a statistical test is the probability that the test will correctly reject the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is genuinely false. Low power may therefore contribute to the poor reproducibility of scientific findings, which continues to be a cause of concern.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The widely used null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) framework grew out of the distinct statistical theories of Fisher, and Neyman and Pearson. From Fisher, this chapter considers the concept of null hypothesis testing, and from Neyman-Pearson the concepts of Type I (α) and Type II error (β). Power is a concept arising from Neyman-Pearson theory, and reflects the likelihood of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis (i.e., 1 - β). However, the hybrid statistical theory typically used leans most heavily on Fisher's concept of null hypothesis testing. Within the hybrid NHST framework that continues to dominate within psychological science, the power of a statistical test is the probability that the test will correctly reject the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is genuinely false. Low power may therefore contribute to the poor reproducibility of scientific findings, which continues to be a cause of concern.

Key concepts: Null hypothesis, Statistical hypothesis testing, Type I and type II errors, Null (SQL), Statistical power, Scrutiny, Alternative hypothesis, p-value

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Powering Reproducible Research — Research Paper | ScholarLens