2015Unpublished venueOpen access

Power Analysis using R

S. P. Blomberg

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Thus, a rational approach to hypothesis testing will seek to reject a hypothesis if it is false and accept a hypothesis when it is true. The two types of error are rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true (Type I) and accepting the null hypothesis when it is false (Type II). In the Neyman-Pearson theory, it is usual to fix the Type I error probability (α) at some constant (often at 0.05, but not necessarily), and then choose a test which minimises the Type II error probability (β), conditional on α. The (null) hypothesis is then either rejected when the associated p-value for the test is less than α, or otherwise accepted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Thus, a rational approach to hypothesis testing will seek to reject a hypothesis if it is false and accept a hypothesis when it is true. The two types of error are rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true (Type I) and accepting the null hypothesis when it is false (Type II). In the Neyman-Pearson theory, it is usual to fix the Type I error probability (α) at some constant (often at 0.05, but not necessarily), and then choose a test which minimises the Type II error probability (β), conditional on α. The (null) hypothesis is then either rejected when the associated p-value for the test is less than α, or otherwise accepted.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Thus, a rational approach to hypothesis testing will seek to reject a hypothesis if it is false and accept a hypothesis when it is true. The two types of error are rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true (Type I) and accepting the null hypothesis when it is false (Type II). In the Neyman-Pearson theory, it is usual to fix the Type I error probability (α) at some constant (often at 0.05, but not necessarily), and then choose a test which minimises the Type II error probability (β), conditional on α. The (null) hypothesis is then either rejected when the associated p-value for the test is less than α, or otherwise accepted.

Key concepts: Type I and type II errors, Null hypothesis, p-value, Statistical hypothesis testing, Alternative hypothesis, Mathematics, Statistical power, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Power Analysis using R — Research Paper | ScholarLens