ScholarLens Back to search
2016•BYU Law Library (Brigham Young University)Open access

Getting Brady Right: Why Extending Brady v. Maryland’s Trial Right to Plea Negotiations Better Protects a Defendant’s Constitutional Rights in the Modern Legal Era

James M. Grossman

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Getting Brady Right: Why Extending Brady v. Maryland's Trial Right to Plea Negotiations Better Protects a Defendant'

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Getting Brady Right: Why Extending Brady v. Maryland's Trial Right to Plea Negotiations Better Protects a Defendant'

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Getting Brady Right: Why Extending Brady v. Maryland's Trial Right to Plea Negotiations Better Protects a Defendant'

Key concepts: Law, Plea, Jury, Political science, Criminal justice, Constitutional right, Misdemeanor, Supreme court

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Getting Brady Right: Why Extending Brady v. Maryland’s Trial Right to Plea Negotiations Better Protects a Defendant’s Constitutional Rights in the Modern Legal Era — Research Paper | ScholarLens