Punitive Damages - Addressing the Constitutionality of Punitive Damages in the Third Circuit
Barbara J. Shander
Abstract
Open-access reader
Barbara J. Shander
Abstract
Open-access reader
INTRODUCIONUnited States courts first awarded punitive damages in Genay v. Norris' in 1784.2Today, courts frequently award punitive damages.3 The frequency and magnitude 4 of punitive damages awards raise particular con-1. 1 S.C.L. (1 Bay) 6, 6 (1784).In Genay, the South Carolina Supreme Court awarded "vindictive damages" against the defendant physician.Id.The plaintiff and the defendant, who were both intoxicated, prepared to settle a quarrel with pistols.Id.Before the altercation, the defendant proposed a reconciliation toast.. I. Nonetheless, in order to harm the plaintiff, the defendant secretly spiked plaintiff's wine glass.Id. at 7.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
INTRODUCIONUnited States courts first awarded punitive damages in Genay v. Norris' in 1784.2Today, courts frequently award punitive damages.3 The frequency and magnitude 4 of punitive damages awards raise particular con-1. 1 S.C.L. (1 Bay) 6, 6 (1784).In Genay, the South Carolina Supreme Court awarded "vindictive damages" against the defendant physician.Id.The plaintiff and the defendant, who were both intoxicated, prepared to settle a quarrel with pistols.Id.Before the altercation, the defendant proposed a reconciliation toast.. I. Nonetheless, in order to harm the plaintiff, the defendant secretly spiked plaintiff's wine glass.Id. at 7.
Key concepts: Punitive damages, Constitutionality, Law, Damages, Political science, Supreme court