2006Geburtshilfe und FrauenheilkundeRequires access

Prenatal diagnosis of a de novo small supernumerary marker chromosome 16

Anja Kron, J. TRUBENBACH, P. H. Vogt, Thomas Liehr, Thomas Liehr, Jochen Decker, Daniela Steinberger

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In about 0.05% of newborn children, small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) are detected. The majority of these sSMC is proven to be de novo. The clinical outcome of an sSMC is difficult to predict as they can have different phenotypic consequences because of differences in the euchromatic content of DNA, differences in the degree of mosaicism or existence of an uniparental disomy (UPD) of the chromosomes homologous to the sSMC. We report here on the prenatal detection of a small supernumerary marker chromosome from chromosome 16. Prenatal cytogenetic analysis of cultured amniocytes was performed at week 17 of gestation. In all cells analysed a male chromosome complement with a paracentric inversion of the short arm of the X chromosome was found. This finding was confirmed by FISH analysis. Furthermore, in 18 out of 25 cells a supernumerary marker chromosome was detected. CenM-FISH and subcenM-FISH revealed that the marker chromosome consists of heterochromatic and euchromatic regions of chromosome 16 (min(16)(: p11.21->q11.1:)), leading to a partial trisomy of 16p11.21->16q11.1. With microsatellite analysis a maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 16 was proven. After 39 weeks of gestation a boy of 2960g was spontaneously delivered with an Apgar score of?/10/10. Clinical examination revealed besides a posterior plagiocephaly, no indication for malformations or abnormalities of internal organs so far. Since only few cases of prenatal diagnosed de novo supernumerary marker derived from chromosome 16 have been reported, clinical consequences of the chromosomal findings can not be definetely predicted. Thus, careful follow-up examinations are indicated. Among the cases that were published, only one case seems to have comparable breakpoints to the case we present here. For this casuistic, a 3 month old girl with macroglossia, dysmorphic features, mild gross motor delay and asymmetric lower extremities was described.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In about 0.05% of newborn children, small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) are detected. The majority of these sSMC is proven to be de novo. The clinical outcome of an sSMC is difficult to predict as they can have different phenotypic consequences because of differences in the euchromatic content of DNA, differences in the degree of mosaicism or existence of an uniparental disomy (UPD) of the chromosomes homologous to the sSMC. We report here on the prenatal detection of a small supernumerary marker chromosome from chromosome 16. Prenatal cytogenetic analysis of cultured amniocytes was performed at week 17 of gestation. In all cells analysed a male chromosome complement with a paracentric inversion of the short arm of the X chromosome was found. This finding was confirmed by FISH analysis. Furthermore, in 18 out of 25 cells a supernumerary marker chromosome was detected. CenM-FISH and subcenM-FISH revealed that the marker chromosome consists of heterochromatic and euchromatic regions of chromosome 16 (min(16)(: p11.21->q11.1:)), leading to a partial trisomy of 16p11.21->16q11.1. With microsatellite analysis a maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 16 was proven. After 39 weeks of gestation a boy of 2960g was spontaneously delivered with an Apgar score of?/10/10. Clinical examination revealed besides a posterior plagiocephaly, no indication for malformations or abnormalities of internal organs so far. Since only few cases of prenatal diagnosed de novo supernumerary marker derived from chromosome 16 have been reported, clinical consequences of the chromosomal findings can not be definetely predicted. Thus, careful follow-up examinations are indicated. Among the cases that were published, only one case seems to have comparable breakpoints to the case we present here. For this casuistic, a 3 month old girl with macroglossia, dysmorphic features, mild gross motor delay and asymmetric lower extremities was described.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In about 0.05% of newborn children, small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) are detected. The majority of these sSMC is proven to be de novo. The clinical outcome of an sSMC is difficult to predict as they can have different phenotypic consequences because of differences in the euchromatic content of DNA, differences in the degree of mosaicism or existence of an uniparental disomy (UPD) of the chromosomes homologous to the sSMC. We report here on the prenatal detection of a small supernumerary marker chromosome from chromosome 16. Prenatal cytogenetic analysis of cultured amniocytes was performed at week 17 of gestation. In all cells analysed a male chromosome complement with a paracentric inversion of the short arm of the X chromosome was found. This finding was confirmed by FISH analysis. Furthermore, in 18 out of 25 cells a supernumerary marker chromosome was detected. CenM-FISH and subcenM-FISH revealed that the marker chromosome consists of heterochromatic and euchromatic regions of chromosome 16 (min(16)(: p11.21->q11.1:)), leading to a partial trisomy of 16p11.21->16q11.1. With microsatellite analysis a maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 16 was proven. After 39 weeks of gestation a boy of 2960g was spontaneously delivered with an Apgar score of?/10/10. Clinical examination revealed besides a posterior plagiocephaly, no indication for malformations or abnormalities of internal organs so far. Since only few cases of prenatal diagnosed de novo supernumerary marker derived from chromosome 16 have been reported, clinical consequences of the chromosomal findings can not be definetely predicted. Thus, careful follow-up examinations are indicated. Among the cases that were published, only one case seems to have comparable breakpoints to the case we present here. For this casuistic, a 3 month old girl with macroglossia, dysmorphic features, mild gross motor delay and asymmetric lower extremities was described.

Key concepts: Small supernumerary marker chromosome, Uniparental disomy, Marker chromosome, Biology, Supernumerary, Genetics, Chromosome 15, Chromosome 21

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prenatal diagnosis of a de novo small supernumerary marker chromosome 16 — Research Paper | ScholarLens