2006Prenatal DiagnosisRequires access

Supernumerary marker chromosomes detected in 100 000 prenatal diagnoses: molecular cytogenetic studies and clinical significance

Bing Huang, Sharon D. Solomon, Maya Thangavelu, Katherine B. Peters, Sucheta Bhatt

Open publisher page 37 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical significance of the supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs) detected during prenatal diagnosis. METHODS: We retrospectively studied cytogenetic/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results and clinical evaluation of 110 marker cases identified from approximately 100,000 cases referred for prenatal diagnosis. The clinical follow-up performed was focused on cases with de novo markers not derived from chromosome 15. RESULTS: Among the 110 SMCs, 79 (71.8%) were de novo, 24 (21.8%) were familial, and the origin was undetermined in 7 cases. Fifty-eight of the SMCs originated from nonacrocentric chromosomes and 52 SMCs were derived from acrocentric chromosomes, with 27 originating from chromosome 15. Twenty-two of the SMCs from chromosome 15 did not contain the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome critical region, and uniparental disomy was ruled out in 19/19 cases. Clinical information ranging from birth to 4 years was obtained for 46 de novo cases with nonchromosome-15-derived SMCs. Of these cases, 11/11 acrocentric SMCs resulted in normal phenotype. In contrast, 4/23 cases with single nonacrocentric SMCs and 3/5 cases with two or more SMCs resulted in an abnormal phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests an overall low risk for acrocentric SMCs and a higher risk for nonacrocentric SMCs. Phenotypes associated with markers derived from some specific chromosomes are also discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical significance of the supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs) detected during prenatal diagnosis. METHODS: We retrospectively studied cytogenetic/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results and clinical evaluation of 110 marker cases identified from approximately 100,000 cases referred for prenatal diagnosis. The clinical follow-up performed was focused on cases with de novo markers not derived from chromosome 15. RESULTS: Among the 110 SMCs, 79 (71.8%) were de novo, 24 (21.8%) were familial, and the origin was undetermined in 7 cases. Fifty-eight of the SMCs originated from nonacrocentric chromosomes and 52 SMCs were derived from acrocentric chromosomes, with 27 originating from chromosome 15. Twenty-two of the SMCs from chromosome 15 did not contain the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome critical region, and uniparental disomy was ruled out in 19/19 cases. Clinical information ranging from birth to 4 years was obtained for 46 de novo cases with nonchromosome-15-derived SMCs. Of these cases, 11/11 acrocentric SMCs resulted in normal phenotype. In contrast, 4/23 cases with single nonacrocentric SMCs and 3/5 cases with two or more SMCs resulted in an abnormal phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests an overall low risk for acrocentric SMCs and a higher risk for nonacrocentric SMCs. Phenotypes associated with markers derived from some specific chromosomes are also discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical significance of the supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs) detected during prenatal diagnosis. METHODS: We retrospectively studied cytogenetic/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results and clinical evaluation of 110 marker cases identified from approximately 100,000 cases referred for prenatal diagnosis. The clinical follow-up performed was focused on cases with de novo markers not derived from chromosome 15. RESULTS: Among the 110 SMCs, 79 (71.8%) were de novo, 24 (21.8%) were familial, and the origin was undetermined in 7 cases. Fifty-eight of the SMCs originated from nonacrocentric chromosomes and 52 SMCs were derived from acrocentric chromosomes, with 27 originating from chromosome 15. Twenty-two of the SMCs from chromosome 15 did not contain the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome critical region, and uniparental disomy was ruled out in 19/19 cases. Clinical information ranging from birth to 4 years was obtained for 46 de novo cases with nonchromosome-15-derived SMCs. Of these cases, 11/11 acrocentric SMCs resulted in normal phenotype. In contrast, 4/23 cases with single nonacrocentric SMCs and 3/5 cases with two or more SMCs resulted in an abnormal phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests an overall low risk for acrocentric SMCs and a higher risk for nonacrocentric SMCs. Phenotypes associated with markers derived from some specific chromosomes are also discussed.

Key concepts: Small supernumerary marker chromosome, Uniparental disomy, Supernumerary, Marker chromosome, Biology, Fluorescence in situ hybridization, Centromere, Prenatal diagnosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Supernumerary marker chromosomes detected in 100 000 prenatal diagnoses: molecular cytogenetic studies and clinical significance — Research Paper | ScholarLens