2016•Agronomy JournalRequires access

Soil Total Carbon and Crop Yield Affected by Crop Rotation and Cultural Practice

Upendra M. Sainju, Andrew William Lenssen, Brett L. Allen, William B. Stevens, Jalal D. Jabro

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Core Ideas Stacked crop rotation and improved cultural practice can control pests. The effects of such management practices on soil total carbon is lacking. Effects of crop rotation and cultural practice on STC and crop yield were evaluated. Crop yield and STC at several depths were lower in stacked than other rotations. Alternate‐year rotation may enhance crop yield and STC compared to other rotations. Stacked crop rotations and improved cultural practices have been used to control pests, but their impact on soil total carbon (STC) (soil organic carbon [SOC] + soil inorganic carbon [SIC]) and crop yield are lacking. We evaluated the effects of stacked vs. alternate‐year rotations and cultural practices on STC at the 0‐ to 125‐cm depth and annualized crop yields from 2005 to 2011 in the northern Great Plains. Stacked rotations were durum ( Triticum turgidum L.)–durum–canola ( Brassica napus L.)–pea ( Pisum sativum L.) (D–D–C–P) and durum–durum–flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.)–pea (D–D–F–P). Alternate‐year rotations were durum–canola–durum–pea (D–C–D–P) and durum–flax–durum–pea (D–F–D–P). A continuous durum (CD) was used as a reference. Cultural practices were traditional (conventional till, recommended seed rate, broadcast N fertilization, and reduced stubble height) and ecological (no‐till, increased seed rate, banded N fertilization, and increased stubble height) treatments. Annualized crop biomass residue returned to the soil and grain yield were greater with D–C–D–P and D–D–C–P than D–D–F–P and greater with the ecological than the traditional practice. The STC concentration increased with depth and was greater with CD and D–C–D–P than D–D–C–P and D–D–F–P in traditional and ecological practices at 20 to 50 cm. At 50 to 88 cm, STC concentration was greater with D–F–D–P than D–D–F–P in the traditional practice. At 0 to 125 cm, STC content was lower with D‐D‐F‐P than other crop rotations. Stacked rotations, especially D–D–F–P, reduced soil C storage and crop yields compared with alternate‐year rotations. For enhancing soil C storage and crop yields, alternate‐year crop rotations are recommended.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Core Ideas Stacked crop rotation and improved cultural practice can control pests. The effects of such management practices on soil total carbon is lacking. Effects of crop rotation and cultural practice on STC and crop yield were evaluated. Crop yield and STC at several depths were lower in stacked than other rotations. Alternate‐year rotation may enhance crop yield and STC compared to other rotations. Stacked crop rotations and improved cultural practices have been used to control pests, but their impact on soil total carbon (STC) (soil organic carbon [SOC] + soil inorganic carbon [SIC]) and crop yield are lacking. We evaluated the effects of stacked vs. alternate‐year rotations and cultural practices on STC at the 0‐ to 125‐cm depth and annualized crop yields from 2005 to 2011 in the northern Great Plains. Stacked rotations were durum ( Triticum turgidum L.)–durum–canola ( Brassica napus L.)–pea ( Pisum sativum L.) (D–D–C–P) and durum–durum–flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.)–pea (D–D–F–P). Alternate‐year rotations were durum–canola–durum–pea (D–C–D–P) and durum–flax–durum–pea (D–F–D–P). A continuous durum (CD) was used as a reference. Cultural practices were traditional (conventional till, recommended seed rate, broadcast N fertilization, and reduced stubble height) and ecological (no‐till, increased seed rate, banded N fertilization, and increased stubble height) treatments. Annualized crop biomass residue returned to the soil and grain yield were greater with D–C–D–P and D–D–C–P than D–D–F–P and greater with the ecological than the traditional practice. The STC concentration increased with depth and was greater with CD and D–C–D–P than D–D–C–P and D–D–F–P in traditional and ecological practices at 20 to 50 cm. At 50 to 88 cm, STC concentration was greater with D–F–D–P than D–D–F–P in the traditional practice. At 0 to 125 cm, STC content was lower with D‐D‐F‐P than other crop rotations. Stacked rotations, especially D–D–F–P, reduced soil C storage and crop yields compared with alternate‐year rotations. For enhancing soil C storage and crop yields, alternate‐year crop rotations are recommended.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Core Ideas Stacked crop rotation and improved cultural practice can control pests. The effects of such management practices on soil total carbon is lacking. Effects of crop rotation and cultural practice on STC and crop yield were evaluated. Crop yield and STC at several depths were lower in stacked than other rotations. Alternate‐year rotation may enhance crop yield and STC compared to other rotations. Stacked crop rotations and improved cultural practices have been used to control pests, but their impact on soil total carbon (STC) (soil organic carbon [SOC] + soil inorganic carbon [SIC]) and crop yield are lacking. We evaluated the effects of stacked vs. alternate‐year rotations and cultural practices on STC at the 0‐ to 125‐cm depth and annualized crop yields from 2005 to 2011 in the northern Great Plains. Stacked rotations were durum ( Triticum turgidum L.)–durum–canola ( Brassica napus L.)–pea ( Pisum sativum L.) (D–D–C–P) and durum–durum–flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.)–pea (D–D–F–P). Alternate‐year rotations were durum–canola–durum–pea (D–C–D–P) and durum–flax–durum–pea (D–F–D–P). A continuous durum (CD) was used as a reference. Cultural practices were traditional (conventional till, recommended seed rate, broadcast N fertilization, and reduced stubble height) and ecological (no‐till, increased seed rate, banded N fertilization, and increased stubble height) treatments. Annualized crop biomass residue returned to the soil and grain yield were greater with D–C–D–P and D–D–C–P than D–D–F–P and greater with the ecological than the traditional practice. The STC concentration increased with depth and was greater with CD and D–C–D–P than D–D–C–P and D–D–F–P in traditional and ecological practices at 20 to 50 cm. At 50 to 88 cm, STC concentration was greater with D–F–D–P than D–D–F–P in the traditional practice. At 0 to 125 cm, STC content was lower with D‐D‐F‐P than other crop rotations. Stacked rotations, especially D–D–F–P, reduced soil C storage and crop yields compared with alternate‐year rotations. For enhancing soil C storage and crop yields, alternate‐year crop rotations are recommended.

Key concepts: Crop rotation, Agronomy, Canola, Crop, Soil carbon, Sativum, Crop residue, Yield (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Soil Total Carbon and Crop Yield Affected by Crop Rotation and Cultural Practice — Research Paper | ScholarLens