1997•HortScienceOpen access

Seasonal Variation of Photosynthetic Efficiency of Greenhouse Tomato Plants

Olfa Ayari, Martine Dorais, Gilles Turcotte, André Gosselin

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Yield of greenhouse tomatoes has greatly increased during the past decade due to the development of more-productive cultivars and to the use of new technologies, such as supplemental lighting and CO 2 enrichment. Under high PPF and p[CO 2 ] , however, the capacity of tomato plants to use supplemental energy and CO 2 decreases. Our project aimed at determining the limits of photosynthetic capacity of tomato plants under supplemental lighting (HPS lamps, 100 μmol·m –2 ·s –1 , photoperiod of 14 to 17 h) and high p[CO 2 ] (900 ppm). The following measurements were made on the 5th and the 10th leaves of tomato plants at regular intervals from November to May: diurnal changes in net (P n ) and maximum (P max ) photosynthetic rate, Chl a fluorescence of dark-adapted and no dark-adapted leaves, and the soluble sugars and starch contents of the 5th and 10th leaves. Changes in global radiation from 250 W/m 2 in winter to about 850 W/m 2 in spring resulted in P n increases of 45% and 42% in the 5th and 10th leaves, respectively. During the winter period, P max was higher than P n , suggesting that leaves were not at maximum photosynthetic capacity. In the spring, no difference was found between P max and P n . Sucrose concentration in leaves increased progressively up to a maximum of 12-h photoperiod, while hexoses remained constant. The Fv/Fm ratio did not vary during winter, but significantly decreased during spring due to photoinhibition. Increases in global radiation during spring resulted in lower photosynthetic rates, higher fluorescence, and starch accumulation in leaves. Data will be discussed in terms of crop efficiency and yield.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Yield of greenhouse tomatoes has greatly increased during the past decade due to the development of more-productive cultivars and to the use of new technologies, such as supplemental lighting and CO 2 enrichment. Under high PPF and p[CO 2 ] , however, the capacity of tomato plants to use supplemental energy and CO 2 decreases. Our project aimed at determining the limits of photosynthetic capacity of tomato plants under supplemental lighting (HPS lamps, 100 μmol·m –2 ·s –1 , photoperiod of 14 to 17 h) and high p[CO 2 ] (900 ppm). The following measurements were made on the 5th and the 10th leaves of tomato plants at regular intervals from November to May: diurnal changes in net (P n ) and maximum (P max ) photosynthetic rate, Chl a fluorescence of dark-adapted and no dark-adapted leaves, and the soluble sugars and starch contents of the 5th and 10th leaves. Changes in global radiation from 250 W/m 2 in winter to about 850 W/m 2 in spring resulted in P n increases of 45% and 42% in the 5th and 10th leaves, respectively. During the winter period, P max was higher than P n , suggesting that leaves were not at maximum photosynthetic capacity. In the spring, no difference was found between P max and P n . Sucrose concentration in leaves increased progressively up to a maximum of 12-h photoperiod, while hexoses remained constant. The Fv/Fm ratio did not vary during winter, but significantly decreased during spring due to photoinhibition. Increases in global radiation during spring resulted in lower photosynthetic rates, higher fluorescence, and starch accumulation in leaves. Data will be discussed in terms of crop efficiency and yield.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Yield of greenhouse tomatoes has greatly increased during the past decade due to the development of more-productive cultivars and to the use of new technologies, such as supplemental lighting and CO 2 enrichment. Under high PPF and p[CO 2 ] , however, the capacity of tomato plants to use supplemental energy and CO 2 decreases. Our project aimed at determining the limits of photosynthetic capacity of tomato plants under supplemental lighting (HPS lamps, 100 μmol·m –2 ·s –1 , photoperiod of 14 to 17 h) and high p[CO 2 ] (900 ppm). The following measurements were made on the 5th and the 10th leaves of tomato plants at regular intervals from November to May: diurnal changes in net (P n ) and maximum (P max ) photosynthetic rate, Chl a fluorescence of dark-adapted and no dark-adapted leaves, and the soluble sugars and starch contents of the 5th and 10th leaves. Changes in global radiation from 250 W/m 2 in winter to about 850 W/m 2 in spring resulted in P n increases of 45% and 42% in the 5th and 10th leaves, respectively. During the winter period, P max was higher than P n , suggesting that leaves were not at maximum photosynthetic capacity. In the spring, no difference was found between P max and P n . Sucrose concentration in leaves increased progressively up to a maximum of 12-h photoperiod, while hexoses remained constant. The Fv/Fm ratio did not vary during winter, but significantly decreased during spring due to photoinhibition. Increases in global radiation during spring resulted in lower photosynthetic rates, higher fluorescence, and starch accumulation in leaves. Data will be discussed in terms of crop efficiency and yield.

Key concepts: Photosynthesis, Photoinhibition, photoperiodism, Greenhouse, Cultivar, Horticulture, Starch, Photosynthetically active radiation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Seasonal Variation of Photosynthetic Efficiency of Greenhouse Tomato Plants — Research Paper | ScholarLens