10.5 COMPARISON OF ARTERIAL STIFFNESS ASSESSED BY POPMÈTRE® WITH ARTERIAL STIFFNESS ASSESSED BY APPLANATION TONOMETRY: A CLINICAL STUDY
Hasan Obeid, Hakim Khettab, Pierre Boutouyrie, Stéphane Laurent, Magid Hallab
Abstract
Open-access reader
Hasan Obeid, Hakim Khettab, Pierre Boutouyrie, Stéphane Laurent, Magid Hallab
Abstract
Open-access reader
95 % Limits of Agreement (LoA) for the mean interarm difference for a single measurement was 13.2 mmHg.Conclusion: Microlife WatchBP measurement is a feasible method to determine IAD in a clinical setting.Bilateral BP measurements should be performed at first visit to help the clinician choose the right arm for further BP evaluations. 10.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
95 % Limits of Agreement (LoA) for the mean interarm difference for a single measurement was 13.2 mmHg.Conclusion: Microlife WatchBP measurement is a feasible method to determine IAD in a clinical setting.Bilateral BP measurements should be performed at first visit to help the clinician choose the right arm for further BP evaluations. 10.
Key concepts: Arterial stiffness, Medicine, Applanation tonometry, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Blood pressure