Parting the South China Sea.
Mira Rapp-Hooper
Abstract
Mira Rapp-Hooper
Abstract
The author explores the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, an international body in The Hague, a tribunal constituted under the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), on the case filed by the Philippines challenging China's maritime claims to most of the contested waterway in the South China Sea. Topics discussed include problem created by the tribunal's ruling in favor of the Philippines, and significance of the tribunal's ruling.
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The author explores the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, an international body in The Hague, a tribunal constituted under the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), on the case filed by the Philippines challenging China's maritime claims to most of the contested waterway in the South China Sea. Topics discussed include problem created by the tribunal's ruling in favor of the Philippines, and significance of the tribunal's ruling.
Key concepts: Tribunal, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, China, Arbitration, Political science, Law, Convention, Law of the sea