2015•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

The Philippines v. China Case and the South China Sea Disputes

Robert Beckman

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

On 22 January 2013, the Philippines officially notified China that it had instituted arbitral proceedings 1 against China under Annex VII of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This chapter will examine the role of UNCLOS and international law in the South China Sea disputes, and will focus in particular on the significance of the arbitration instituted by the Philippines. It will explain the legal issues raised by the Philippines’ Statement of Claim. It will also analyse the possible impact of the case on the disputes concerning maritime claims in the South China Sea, including China’s claim to rights and jurisdiction in the maritime space inside the infamous nine-dash line on the Chinese map of the South China Sea. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

On 22 January 2013, the Philippines officially notified China that it had instituted arbitral proceedings 1 against China under Annex VII of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This chapter will examine the role of UNCLOS and international law in the South China Sea disputes, and will focus in particular on the significance of the arbitration instituted by the Philippines. It will explain the legal issues raised by the Philippines’ Statement of Claim. It will also analyse the possible impact of the case on the disputes concerning maritime claims in the South China Sea, including China’s claim to rights and jurisdiction in the maritime space inside the infamous nine-dash line on the Chinese map of the South China Sea. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

On 22 January 2013, the Philippines officially notified China that it had instituted arbitral proceedings 1 against China under Annex VII of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This chapter will examine the role of UNCLOS and international law in the South China Sea disputes, and will focus in particular on the significance of the arbitration instituted by the Philippines. It will explain the legal issues raised by the Philippines’ Statement of Claim. It will also analyse the possible impact of the case on the disputes concerning maritime claims in the South China Sea, including China’s claim to rights and jurisdiction in the maritime space inside the infamous nine-dash line on the Chinese map of the South China Sea. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: China, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Jurisdiction, Arbitration, Political science, Geography, Law, Convention

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Philippines v. China Case and the South China Sea Disputes — Research Paper | ScholarLens