2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Human factors and risks in a periodic safety review of a nuclear power plant

J.K. Vaurio

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This paper describes human factors assessments recommended as a part of periodic safety reviews of nuclear power plants. The contents, source material and the report structure are described. This approach has been used in the operating license renewal application of a specific nuclear power station and submitted to safety authorities. The qualitative part of the human factors review is structured according to IAEA Safety Guide No. NS-G-2.10 . The qualitative descriptions are enhanced with statistical data obtained from inspections and assessments made by plant quality assurance (QA) personnel, by regulatory authorities and by peer reviews. The quantitative assessment is based on the roles and contributions of human errors in the accident risk at the plant. The assessment uses importance measures quantified in probabilistic safety assessments (PSA). It considers also the scope and quality of PSA and human reliability assessment, and how PSA is used to reduce errors and improve human factors. The results are quite plan-specific and errors have very different importances in different operating states and for different initiator categories. The results are useful for preventing errors by developing and prioritizing human factors improvement activities.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper describes human factors assessments recommended as a part of periodic safety reviews of nuclear power plants. The contents, source material and the report structure are described. This approach has been used in the operating license renewal application of a specific nuclear power station and submitted to safety authorities. The qualitative part of the human factors review is structured according to IAEA Safety Guide No. NS-G-2.10 . The qualitative descriptions are enhanced with statistical data obtained from inspections and assessments made by plant quality assurance (QA) personnel, by regulatory authorities and by peer reviews. The quantitative assessment is based on the roles and contributions of human errors in the accident risk at the plant. The assessment uses importance measures quantified in probabilistic safety assessments (PSA). It considers also the scope and quality of PSA and human reliability assessment, and how PSA is used to reduce errors and improve human factors. The results are quite plan-specific and errors have very different importances in different operating states and for different initiator categories. The results are useful for preventing errors by developing and prioritizing human factors improvement activities.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper describes human factors assessments recommended as a part of periodic safety reviews of nuclear power plants. The contents, source material and the report structure are described. This approach has been used in the operating license renewal application of a specific nuclear power station and submitted to safety authorities. The qualitative part of the human factors review is structured according to IAEA Safety Guide No. NS-G-2.10 . The qualitative descriptions are enhanced with statistical data obtained from inspections and assessments made by plant quality assurance (QA) personnel, by regulatory authorities and by peer reviews. The quantitative assessment is based on the roles and contributions of human errors in the accident risk at the plant. The assessment uses importance measures quantified in probabilistic safety assessments (PSA). It considers also the scope and quality of PSA and human reliability assessment, and how PSA is used to reduce errors and improve human factors. The results are quite plan-specific and errors have very different importances in different operating states and for different initiator categories. The results are useful for preventing errors by developing and prioritizing human factors improvement activities.

Key concepts: Human reliability, Scope (computer science), Nuclear power plant, Risk analysis (engineering), Human error, Nuclear power, License, Reliability (semiconductor)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Human factors and risks in a periodic safety review of a nuclear power plant — Research Paper | ScholarLens