2014Unpublished venueRequires access

How can the Petroleum Industry Benefit from Human Reliability Analysis?

Yuandan Li, Joseph J. Cho, Yali Ren

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the petroleum industry, the study and impact of human reliability on safe and efficient operations is receiving heightened awareness. According to recent studies, human errors contributed to an estimated 60 to 90 percent of all accidents across many industries (petroleum, nuclear and aviation industries, etc.). Human errors can result in two possible outcomes of concern: safety risks and the cost of failure. In operations where the consequences of accidents may be unbearable, the emphasis on safety drives the study and research of human reliability. This effort has led to a number of human reliability analysis (HRA) methods, and they provide useful references for managing human errors. This paper examines how the petroleum industry could utilize and benefit from the available HRA methods by applying them to daily operations. Several HRA methods are reviewed in this paper from three aspects: human error identification, human error prediction of given tasks, and factors that contribute to human errors. A good data collection system can substantially support the HRA study qualitatively and quantitatively. This paper also introduces a practice for human error data collection that was implemented in the nuclear industry—human event repository analysis (HERA). Suggestions and remarks are provided about developing similar human error data collection systems tailored for the petroleum industry. The expected benefits of HRA include a better understanding of the causes and influencing factors of human errors in specific operation conditions, and insights into error-reduction measures for reducing accident risk and the cost of product failure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In the petroleum industry, the study and impact of human reliability on safe and efficient operations is receiving heightened awareness. According to recent studies, human errors contributed to an estimated 60 to 90 percent of all accidents across many industries (petroleum, nuclear and aviation industries, etc.). Human errors can result in two possible outcomes of concern: safety risks and the cost of failure. In operations where the consequences of accidents may be unbearable, the emphasis on safety drives the study and research of human reliability. This effort has led to a number of human reliability analysis (HRA) methods, and they provide useful references for managing human errors. This paper examines how the petroleum industry could utilize and benefit from the available HRA methods by applying them to daily operations. Several HRA methods are reviewed in this paper from three aspects: human error identification, human error prediction of given tasks, and factors that contribute to human errors. A good data collection system can substantially support the HRA study qualitatively and quantitatively. This paper also introduces a practice for human error data collection that was implemented in the nuclear industry—human event repository analysis (HERA). Suggestions and remarks are provided about developing similar human error data collection systems tailored for the petroleum industry. The expected benefits of HRA include a better understanding of the causes and influencing factors of human errors in specific operation conditions, and insights into error-reduction measures for reducing accident risk and the cost of product failure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In the petroleum industry, the study and impact of human reliability on safe and efficient operations is receiving heightened awareness. According to recent studies, human errors contributed to an estimated 60 to 90 percent of all accidents across many industries (petroleum, nuclear and aviation industries, etc.). Human errors can result in two possible outcomes of concern: safety risks and the cost of failure. In operations where the consequences of accidents may be unbearable, the emphasis on safety drives the study and research of human reliability. This effort has led to a number of human reliability analysis (HRA) methods, and they provide useful references for managing human errors. This paper examines how the petroleum industry could utilize and benefit from the available HRA methods by applying them to daily operations. Several HRA methods are reviewed in this paper from three aspects: human error identification, human error prediction of given tasks, and factors that contribute to human errors. A good data collection system can substantially support the HRA study qualitatively and quantitatively. This paper also introduces a practice for human error data collection that was implemented in the nuclear industry—human event repository analysis (HERA). Suggestions and remarks are provided about developing similar human error data collection systems tailored for the petroleum industry. The expected benefits of HRA include a better understanding of the causes and influencing factors of human errors in specific operation conditions, and insights into error-reduction measures for reducing accident risk and the cost of product failure.

Key concepts: Human reliability, Human error, Reliability (semiconductor), Risk analysis (engineering), Identification (biology), Data collection, Computer science, Reliability engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How can the Petroleum Industry Benefit from Human Reliability Analysis? — Research Paper | ScholarLens